referee-response
From the author
Organize an author's response to peer review: extract every referee point, order the revision by dependency, flag possible pushbacks, and build the response-letter skeleton the author fills in. Use for revise-and-resubmit planning, response letters, or checking every point was answered.
Install
npx skills add scdenney/open-science-skills --skill referee-response -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/referee-response/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (Custom or unclear) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 77
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- respond-to-refereespedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowGenerate a structured response-to-referees document from a referee report and the revised manuscript. Maps each referee comment to the specific revision, classifies coverage (addressed / partially / deferred / disagreement), and drafts polite but firm responses. Use during the R&R (revise-and-resubmit) stage of paper revision.Science★ 1.7K
- paper-referee-revisebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsRevise an academic paper based on journal referee reports. Reads referee comments from review report or annotated manuscript, then directly modifies main.tex one comment at a time with user approval. Generates response letter after revision. Trigger when user says "referee revise" / "paper-referee-revise" / "审稿意见修改" / "根据审稿人意见修改" / "referee report".Science★ 4.8K
- rebuttal-and-response-to-reviewersKalarisLabs/research-agent-skillsPlan and write responses to peer review, including journal "response to reviewers" letters for revise-and-resubmit, conference rebuttals under strict length limits (OpenReview/ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL ARR, CVPR), author responses to meta-reviews, and appeals. Use when a user receives reviews, must triage reviewer comments, draft point-by-point replies, decide what new experiments to run, disagree respectfully with a reviewer, or track manuscript changes for a revision. For authors answering reviews of their own manuscript; to write a review of someone else's paper, use peer-review instead.Science★ 61
- review-plantobihagemann/turboReview a plan by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my plan", "check my plan", "critique my plan", or wants feedback on a plan.Planning★ 416
- stata-referee-responsebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsOrganize and execute Stata workflows for referee responses, robustness requests, and coauthor follow-ups. Use when the user needs to answer a critique with targeted reruns, tables, figures, and a defensible audit trail.Other★ 4.8K
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in