nasa-technical-writing
From the author
Draft, restructure, or audit evidence-led scientific and engineering reports using an independently expressed reference-only interpretation of official NASA technical-publication guidance. Use for test and experiment reports, design descriptions, technical memoranda, engineering analyses, and scientific publications that must preserve measurements, conditions, limitations, and traceability from evidence to conclusions.
Install
npx skills add Neeeophytee/agent-stylebooks --skill nasa-technical-writing -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/nasa-technical-writing/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- scientific-writingforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsUse when writing or revising scientific manuscript prose: IMRAD sections, abstracts, figure/table captions, citation-integrated paragraphs, reporting-guideline language, terminology, clarity, and journal-submission text.Science★ 3.8K
- w3c-technical-reportsNeeeophytee/agent-stylebooksDraft, restructure, or audit specification-style technical reports using an independently expressed reference-only interpretation of W3C editorial guidance. Use for protocols, standards, interoperability documents, conformance requirements, and technical specifications that must separate normative requirements from explanation and define precise, testable behavior without inventing requirements.Writing★ 78
- technical-writingbacknotprop/pstackLayered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.Writing★ 3.2K
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- paper-writingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when drafting, rewriting, reviewing, or auditing prose for any section of an empirical academic paper (Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Data, Results, Discussion, Conclusion) or specialized output (job market paper, grant proposal, policy brief, referee response).Science★ 4.8K
- science-research-writingYila-AI/awesome-research-skillsUse when researchers need to plan, draft, revise, or audit an empirical research paper from their own materials, including Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, Abstract, and Title, with evidence-preserving and target-journal-aware guidance.Science★ 140
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in