rethink
From the author
Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for generating alternatives, and not for critiquing a spec, which is /pushback.
Install
npx skills add Ovid/paad --skill rethink -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/rethink/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 84
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGive advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.Engineering★ 1.4K
- ultra-thinkcoco-research/cocoUse when facing architectural decisions, complex trade-offs, strategic technology choices, or scaling and migration questions that deserve more than a quick answer. Lays out options with trade-offs, then a recommendation.Planning★ 787
- brainstormhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsExplore ideas, compare approaches, and produce a validated spec before planning. Use when the user describes what to build, asks how to approach something, proposes a new feature or design change, or needs to explore options before implementation.Planning★ 1.4K
- brainstormingJetBrains/thinkrailUse before implementing a feature, a change in behavior, or a bug fix — however small. Not for questions, checks, or edits that change no behavior (typos, documentation or configuration only, mechanical refactors).Planning★ 1.1K
- review-plantobihagemann/turboReview a plan by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my plan", "check my plan", "critique my plan", or wants feedback on a plan.Planning★ 416
- robustness-checksbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when a main specification has produced a result, when preparing a paper appendix, when a reviewer requests robustness, or before declaring any empirical finding final. Guides selection of design-appropriate checks without mandating a fixed checklist.Design★ 4.8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in