scientific-figure
From the author
Use when the user has scientific data (or a prompt alluding to scientific data) and wants a publication-quality figure made from it. A generator drafts and renders a figure that lands a frozen communication goal; an adversarial critic critiques it hard and grades it 1-5 per axis against a fixed rubric (message, aesthetic, clarity, integrity, and a conditional domain-completeness axis), aggregates to 0-100, and decides pass; the generator revises against the critic's findings until the grade clears a threshold or the budget is hit. Both roles may consult the literature (Semantic Scholar + arXiv) to verify domain content (e.g. a pathway figure's gene set, or a benchmark's reported numbers), and conform to / grade against a named journal's figure spec fetched via web search. Not for writing a paper or analyzing a dataset, and not for editing an existing finished image — this renders a figure from data/brief and iterates on it.
Install
npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill scientific-figure -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/scientific-figure/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- scientific-writergaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user has a scientific draft (with its dataset, figures, and optional analysis code) and wants it iteratively revised until it clears a quality bar. Five specialist judges (figures, scientific content, style, formatting, code) critique the draft; a fresh, independent peer_reviewer grades it on those same axes (1-5 each → a percentage) with honesty guardrails; a scientific_writer revises prose, figures, and code — regenerating figures by running the user's plot command — until the peer-review score clears the threshold or the budget is hit. Not for writing a paper from a blank page, and not for a standalone literature survey.Science★ 177
- sci-figuresbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to finalize Science display items — panel/word budget, column-width sizing, minimum font sizes, color-accessibility, and showing the data (points over bars). Enforces figure rigor before submission.Science★ 1.3K
- paper-figurewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepGenerate publication-quality figures and tables from experiment results. Use when user says \"画图\", \"作图\", \"generate figures\", \"paper figures\", or needs plots for a paper.Science★ 18K
- nature-figureYuan1z0825/nature-skillsCreate, revise, audit, and export manuscript scientific figures in Python or R. Use for 论文配图、科研绘图、多面板图 and submission-ready plots, or explicitly requested AI-generated graphical abstracts and mechanism schematics. Not for interactive dashboards, data cleaning, or statistics-only analysis.Science★ 50.4K
- figure-styleaipoch/open-sciencePublication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a visual house style. For multi-panel composition use `figure-composer`; for whole-paper ordering use `paper-narrative`.Testing★ 5.4K
- scientific-visualizationK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsCreates and audits truthful, accessible, publication-ready scientific figures with Matplotlib, Seaborn, or Plotly. Use it for figure design, multi-panel layouts, uncertainty and missing-data displays, color/contrast review, image metadata validation, and journal export planning.Science★ 54.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in