nejm-reporting
From the author
Use to select and enforce the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a clinical study headed to NEJM — CONSORT for RCTs (with the participant flow diagram), STROBE for observational, PRISMA for systematic reviews — and to build the required checklist and diagram before submission.
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nejm-reporting -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/nejm-reporting/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- nejm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse as the final preflight before submitting to NEJM — a complete clinical checklist across significance, registration, reporting guidelines, abstract, statistics, display items, ethics, references, and required files. Bundles a checklist and a clinical cover-letter template.Science★ 1.3K
- nejm-statisticsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to enforce NEJM's clinical statistical reporting — confidence intervals over bare P values, the pre-specified intention-to-treat primary analysis, multiplicity control for secondary endpoints, pre-specified subgroups with interaction tests, missing-data handling, and absolute risk with NNT alongside relative measures.Testing★ 1.3K
- nejm-fitbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse this first, before any writing, to stress-test whether a clinical study clears NEJM's bar — practice-changing clinical impact, methodological rigor, and generalizability. Decides NEJM vs Lancet/JAMA vs a specialty journal.Testing★ 1.3K
- nejm-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after NEJM reviews arrive — often including a dedicated statistical reviewer and an editor letter — to triage the decision, answer statistical comments rigorously, and draft a point-by-point response that quotes each comment, the response, and the revised manuscript text. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.Writing★ 1.3K
- nejm-ethicsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to confirm clinical ethics and research-integrity requirements for an NEJM submission — IRB/ethics-committee approval and informed consent per the Declaration of Helsinki, ICMJE conflict-of-interest disclosures and authorship criteria, the role-of-the-funding-source statement, and the ICMJE data-sharing statement.Science★ 1.3K
- nejm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding which nejm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a clinical manuscript from significance test through response to reviewers for The New England Journal of Medicine. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Productivity★ 1.3K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in