From the author
Use to choose the PNAS submission track — Direct Submission (standard, editor-assigned, peer reviewed) vs Contributed Submission (an NAS member communicates their own paper). Covers eligibility, the editor/member role, the discontinued and legacy tracks, and how to pick. Unique to PNAS.
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pnas-track -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/pnas-track/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- pnas-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to structure a PNAS main text and hold its length — Title, Significance Statement, Abstract, Introduction, Results, Discussion, in-text Materials and Methods, references — and to choose the required Classification (Biological/Physical/Social Sciences + minor subject) and keywords at submission.Writing★ 1.3K
- aamas-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an AAMAS main-track submission for OpenReview readiness, the 8-page-plus-references limit, the full-paper versus 2-page extended-abstract choice, double-blind anonymity, the supplementary zip cap, track fit across the AAAI/JAAMAS/Blue Sky tracks, dual-submission rules, and desk-reject triggers before upload.Science★ 1.3K
- nominationapache/magpieRead-only nomination brief for a named contributor on <upstream>. Aggregates code-host and tracker activity across contribution tracks, off-forge signal, and vendor-neutrality context for committer or PMC nomination threads. Surfaces information only: never rates the contributor or says whether they are ready.Engineering★ 131
- nasa-technical-writingNeeeophytee/agent-stylebooksDraft, restructure, or audit evidence-led scientific and engineering reports using an independently expressed reference-only interpretation of official NASA technical-publication guidance. Use for test and experiment reports, design descriptions, technical memoranda, engineering analyses, and scientific publications that must preserve measurements, conditions, limitations, and traceability from evidence to conclusions.Writing★ 78
- science-journal-selectionyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when choosing where to submit, when a paper was desk-rejected without review, when deciding between a top journal and a solid sub-journal, or when planning the submission chain; covers the three-tier strategy, why scope beats prestige, format red lines, and how to use transfer and portable-review routes.Science★ 401
- pnas-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding which pnas-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Productivity★ 1.3K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in