shipping-build-artifacts
From the author
Make the build step a real gate on what you actually distribute — build scripts that warn and exit 0 on a missing input, size checks with only an upper bound, hand-maintained file lists that drift from the entrypoints they must cover, committed bundles that go stale when only the source changes, GNU-only shell in release scripts that aborts on the other OS, and verification that runs against the source tree instead of the artifact. Use when writing or reviewing a build/package script, a `dist/` copy step, a release workflow that uploads a zip or installer, or a committed compiled asset.
Install
npx skills add kajisho5/ffmpeg-skill --skill shipping-build-artifacts -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/shipping-build-artifacts/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 89
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- verify-artifactpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowProve that the file you are about to send, publish, or hand off IS the thing you mean — before it leaves your hands. Rebuild from source, check integrity, diff the derived artifact against its source, and require the recipient to echo what they received. Use before sending a paper/PDF for review, shipping a release or replication package, handing files to a coauthor or collaborator, uploading anything to an external reviewer or model, or publishing. Prevents an entire review/QA cycle from being spent on defects that exist only in the artifact, not in the work.Testing★ 1.7K
- shipping-artifactsphuryn/pm-skillsThe durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.Security★ 27.3K
- game-buildzenstory-ai/novel-to-gameBuild a risk-matched whitebox or the approved production game for its target runtime. Turn GAME_DESIGN, and ART_DIRECTION when production begins, into a minimal BUILD_BRIEF and a runnable candidate that can be iterated with replayable evidence. Use for prototype the riskiest design question, implement the approved game design, or turn this design into a running game. 游戏构建执行。先按最大风险做白盒，或在正式生产时把批准后的 GAME_DESIGN 与 ART_DIRECTION 压缩成最小 BUILD_BRIEF，在目标运行环境中实现可运行候选并用可回放证据迭代。用于验证高风险设计问题、构建游戏原型或实现批准方案。Design★ 908
- rig-bundles-and-shareable-artifactsmvschwarz/openrigUse when authoring or installing a rig bundle (packaged, shareable artifact that instantiates an opinionated OpenRig topology + workflow), reasoning about the bundle vs extension boundary, or auditing a bundle for portability. Covers the 4 failure modes that prevent bundles from working anywhere but the operator's machine, and the inspect-before-install discipline.Productivity★ 8.1K
- writing-specsJetBrains/thinkrailUse when a workflow step drafts or revises a spec artifact — a goal-and-requirements, an architecture, or a module SPEC — or when a workflow skill names it at such a step. The shared quality bar for specs — not a workflow, nothing to execute.Writing★ 982
- write-specdzhng/skillsBreak large features into independently verifiable, human-reviewable slices under a feature directory in specs/. Use for risky or multi-step feature work that needs upfront questioning, API seams, browser-playable checkpoints, HTML visualizations, screenshot gates, staged implementation plans, recursive fog-of-war reslicing, or proactive research into reference implementations/best practices before slicing. Pairs with your project's verification harness and screenshot gates (the browser checkpoints), [refactor-clean](../refactor-clean/SKILL.md) (review the materialized spec so the plan describes one-owner architecture, not the feature bolted on), [screenshot-critique](../../visual/screenshot-critique/SKILL.md) and [compare-screenshots](../../visual/compare-screenshots/SKILL.md) (the visual gates), and a code-review pass (audit each slice before it lands).Writing★ 1.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in