doublecheck
From the author
Three-layer verification pipeline for AI output. Extracts verifiable claims, finds supporting or contradicting sources via web search, runs adversarial review for hallucination patterns, and produces a structured verification report with source links for human review.
Install
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill doublecheck -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/doublecheck/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 95
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- literature-reviewaipoch/open-scienceFind, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.Engineering★ 5.3K
- self-evalalirezarezvani/claude-skillsHonestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation, forces devil's advocate reasoning, and persists scores across sessions.Engineering★ 28.5K
- gsd:eval-reviewdavepoon/buildwithclaudeRetroactively audit an executed AI phase's evaluation coverage — scores each eval dimension as COVERED/PARTIAL/MISSING and produces an actionable EVAL-REVIEW.md with remediation planEngineering★ 3.7K
- yes-mdsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills6-layer AI governance: safety gates, evidence-based debugging, anti-slack detection, and machine-enforced hooks. Makes AI safe, thorough, and honest.Engineering★ 48.3K
- peer-reviewK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsPrepares evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.Engineering★ 53.8K
- adjudicate-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowTurn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.Engineering★ 1.7K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in