ai-verify
De la autor
Use when work has to be verified — "verify the feature", "did we build what was asked", "review this diff", "is it ready to commit" — by choosing the right verification tier (standalone, embedded, or chain) and producing verdicts with evidence, not impressions. Not for milestone-declared security audits — use /ai-security. Not for diagnosing a failure — use /ai-debug.
Instalare
npx skills add arcasilesgroup/ai-engineering --skill ai-verify -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/ai-verify/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Fără descărcare: licența acestui skill (Personalizată sau neclară) nu ne permite să-i redistribuim fișierele. Comenzile de instalare le iau direct de pe GitHub.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 71
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- ai-securityarcasilesgroup/ai-engineeringSix-phase security audit of a codebase — web apps, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons — with adversarial validation: the agent that verifies a finding is never the one that found it. Recon, parallel hunting across 8 attack classes, validation, reporting, schema-validated findings.json, and independent verification. Only exploitable issues with real impact are reported — never theoretical concerns or industry-standard behavior. Use when a milestone declares a security audit, when findings must be validated adversarially, or for trigger phrases "security review", "audit for vulnerabilities", "find security bugs", and "pen-test the code". Not for diagnosing a runtime failure — use /ai-debug. Not for judging a diff for correctness — use /ai-verify.Securitate★ 61
- ai-checkharshaneel/humanizeUse when someone asks "does this sound AI?", "check if this is AI-written", "what gives this away as AI", "run ai-check on this", or "score this text". Also use when reviewing a draft for AI tells before publishing, or when a piece of text reads as suspiciously polished, generic, or pattern-y and the user wants a forensic breakdown of why.Securitate★ 580
- ai-feature-testingnaodeng/awesome-qa-skillsUse this skill when you need to test an AI-enabled product feature for behavior, safety, and user-impact boundaries; triggers include AI 功能测试 and AI feature testing.Testare★ 283
- ai-debugarcasilesgroup/ai-engineeringFinds the root cause of broken behaviour and names it at file:line, then writes the check that fails for that reason before changing anything. Also resolves merge and rebase conflicts by intent rather than by taking a side. Trigger for "it's not working", "this used to work", "I'm getting an error", "CI is failing", "why is X happening", "I have conflicts", "the rebase failed". Not for adding test coverage to working code — use /ai-verify. Not for exploring an unfamiliar area — use /ai-explore. Not for designing the fix — once the cause is named, use /ai-orchestrator. Not for reporting the fault to outsiders — use /ai-issue-report.Inginerie★ 61
- verifycodeaholicguy/ai-devkitAI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.Testare★ 1.7K
- ai-safety-testingnaodeng/awesome-qa-skillsUse this skill when you need evidence-bounded safety policy, abuse categories, refusal/redirect behavior, privacy, escalation, and Human risk decisions; triggers include AI 安全 and AI safety.Testare★ 283
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te