analiza aiqbench
This research addresses critical reliability issues in agentic deep research systems by localizing faithfulness and citation errors to specific agents within multi-agent architectures. The study identifies the orchestrator as a primary source of mistakes, particularly regarding citations, and proposes actionable interventions that significantly improve recall without compromising output quality. By categorizing error types such as hallucinations and uncited input reliance, this work provides essential diagnostics for building more trustworthy autonomous research tools.
Who is the Agent to Blame? Localizing Faithfulness and Citation Mistakes in Agentic Deep Research
arXiv:2608.24306v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research (DR) systems produce long-form cited reports by orchestrating multiple agents that search and synthesize information from the web. Citations are the primary mechanism for evaluating the faithfulness of these reports, yet current DR systems exhibit poor citation recall. Moreover, improving citation recall is challenging because DR systems are complex multi-agent architectures where information passes through agents like a telephone game, and both content and citations can get corrupted along the way. We propose an evaluation method that pinpoints which agent introduced each error by locally testing agent invocations for faithfulness and verifiability relative to their own inputs. Furthermore, we propose a four-type taxonomy to categorize the discovered errors: hallucination, uncited input reliance, uncited output, or insufficient citations. Applying our method to three top-ranked open-source DR systems, we obtain actionable diagnostics. Almost every agent makes a lot of mistakes with the exception being those that summarize a single document. We find that the dominant error type varies systematically across agents, where the orchestrator mistakes are mostly citation-related. We find that 84.7% of final-report errors in AI-Q originate at the orchestrator, roughly 31% of them hallucinations and the rest citation mistakes. Guided by these insights, we demonstrate that two simple interventions raise citation recall by 5% without degrading output quality.
Title:Who is the Agent to Blame? Localizing Faithfulness and Citation Mistakes in Agentic Deep Research
Abstract:Deep research (DR) systems produce long-form cited reports by orchestrating multiple agents that search and synthesize information from the web. Citations are the primary mechanism for evaluating the faithfulness of these reports, yet current DR systems exhibit poor citation recall. Moreover, improving citation recall is challenging because DR systems are complex multi-agent architectures where information passes through agents like a telephone game, and both content and citations can get corrupted along the way. We propose an evaluation method that pinpoints which agent introduced each error by locally testing agent invocations for faithfulness and verifiability relative to their own inputs. Furthermore, we propose a four-type taxonomy to categorize the discovered errors: hallucination, uncited input reliance, uncited output, or insufficient citations. Applying our method to three top-ranked open-source DR systems, we obtain actionable diagnostics. Almost every agent makes a lot of mistakes with the exception being those that summarize a single document. We find that the dominant error type varies systematically across agents, where the orchestrator mistakes are mostly citation-related. We find that 84.7% of final-report errors in AI-Q originate at the orchestrator, roughly 31% of them hallucinations and the rest citation mistakes. Guided by these insights, we demonstrate that two simple interventions raise citation recall by 5% without degrading output quality.
Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference). Code: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.24306 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.24306v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.24306 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 330 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026

Presentation: Beyond Observability: Evolving Production Operations in the Age of AI
InfoQ · 1 oct. 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026