analiza aiqbench
This study compares differentiable physics and PINN frameworks for reconstructing wall shear stress from passive scalar fields in cardiovascular flows, showing that hard-constraint PDE optimization outperforms soft-constraint neural networks when near-wall data is unavailable. The work advances the application of inverse problems in fluid dynamics by demonstrating how measurement location fundamentally impacts reconstruction fidelity using AI-augmented physics models.
Wall Shear Stress Reconstruction from Concentration: Differentiable Physics and Physics-Informed Neural Networks
arXiv:2606.06313v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Wall shear stress (WSS) governs near-wall transport dynamics and is a key hemodynamic indicator in cardiovascular flows, yet remains difficult to infer accurately due to the need for precise computation of near-wall velocity gradients. Passive scalar fields, such as concentration or temperature, are advected by the same underlying velocity field and have the potential to uncover hidden flow physics metrics such as WSS. In this work, we demonstrate such reconstruction from spatially limited passive scalar observations using two fundamentally different inverse frameworks: a differentiable physics framework based on discrete adjoint, PDE-constrained optimization, which enforces the governing equations as hard constraints, and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which treat them as soft constraints. Benchmark problems include a 2D canonical backward-facing step (2D-BFS) and a 3D patient-specific stenotic coronary artery. For the 2D-BFS case, evaluated under three measurement scenarios (near-wall, far-field, and combined), PINN achieves high accuracy when near-wall data are available but fails when restricted to far-field measurements, whereas the differentiable physics approach recovers accurate WSS across all scenarios. In the 3D patient-specific case, the differentiable physics framework outperforms PINNs, yielding accurate WSS reconstruction. These results establish that measurement location and inverse formulation jointly determine reconstruction fidelity in scalar-based near-wall flow inference. The proposed framework opens a path toward estimation of near-wall hemodynamics from scalar transport data, with broader applicability to fluid flow problems where passive scalars can be observed.
Abstract:Wall shear stress (WSS) governs near-wall transport dynamics and is a key hemodynamic indicator in cardiovascular flows, yet remains difficult to infer accurately due to the need for precise computation of near-wall velocity gradients. Passive scalar fields, such as concentration or temperature, are advected by the same underlying velocity field and have the potential to uncover hidden flow physics metrics such as WSS. In this work, we demonstrate such reconstruction from spatially limited passive scalar observations using two fundamentally different inverse frameworks: a differentiable physics framework based on discrete adjoint, PDE-constrained optimization, which enforces the governing equations as hard constraints, and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which treat them as soft constraints. Benchmark problems include a 2D canonical backward-facing step (2D-BFS) and a 3D patient-specific stenotic coronary artery. For the 2D-BFS case, evaluated under three measurement scenarios (near-wall, far-field, and combined), PINN achieves high accuracy when near-wall data are available but fails when restricted to far-field measurements, whereas the differentiable physics approach recovers accurate WSS across all scenarios. In the 3D patient-specific case, the differentiable physics framework outperforms PINNs, yielding accurate WSS reconstruction. These results establish that measurement location and inverse formulation jointly determine reconstruction fidelity in scalar-based near-wall flow inference. The proposed framework opens a path toward estimation of near-wall hemodynamics from scalar transport data, with broader applicability to fluid flow problems where passive scalars can be observed.
Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
arXiv:2606.06313 [physics.flu-dyn]
(or arXiv:2606.06313v2 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06313 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 326 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Building a Foundation Stack for General-Purpose Robots
IEEE Spectrum · 13 iul. 2026

World Models and Yann LeCun’s Bet Against Large Language Models
Quantum Zeitgeist · 17 iul. 2026
Cross-Anatomy Transfer Versus Sparse Interpolation in Digital-Twin-Oriented Aortic Fluid-Structure Interaction Surrogates
arXiv · 16 sept. 2026
No Free Lunch in Flow Surrogates under Time-Varying Boundary Conditions: A Two-Regime Study
arXiv · 28 iul. 2026