analiza aiqbench
This paper demonstrates verifiable quantum advantage using extremely shallow circuits, proving that even minimal-depth quantum processors can solve sampling problems hard for classical computers under lattice-based assumptions. By eliminating the need for mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward, this work establishes a robust framework for proofs of quantumness that relies on efficient classical verification rather than complex hardware control. The findings advance the theoretical understanding of what is achievable with near-term quantum devices without requiring deep circuit architectures.
Verifiable quantum advantage in extremely low depth
arXiv:2609.01448v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We give a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer. The quantum sampler admits two implementations: one uses log-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QNC}^0[\log\log]$ circuits, while the other uses constant-depth quantum circuits with unbounded fan-in gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits. Our construction can be seen as compiling the Learning with Errors (LWE)-based single-round proof of quantumness of Arabadjieva et al. (2025) to very low depth. The price paid for this compilation is the reliance on less standard, though well-motivated, assumptions: in addition to the lattice knowledge assumption used by Arabadjieva et al. (2025), we require a strengthened variant of the adaptive-hardcore-bit property of LWE, for which we provide supporting evidence. Unlike previous low-depth proofs of quantumness, the quantum computation here requires no mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward: it consists only of running a shallow circuit and sampling from its output distribution. This shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
Abstract:We give a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer. The quantum sampler admits two implementations: one uses log-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QNC}^0[\log\log]$ circuits, while the other uses constant-depth quantum circuits with unbounded fan-in gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits. Our construction can be seen as compiling the Learning with Errors (LWE)-based single-round proof of quantumness of Arabadjieva et al. (2025) to very low depth. The price paid for this compilation is the reliance on less standard, though well-motivated, assumptions: in addition to the lattice knowledge assumption used by Arabadjieva et al. (2025), we require a strengthened variant of the adaptive-hardcore-bit property of LWE, for which we provide supporting evidence. Unlike previous low-depth proofs of quantumness, the quantum computation here requires no mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward: it consists only of running a shallow circuit and sampling from its output distribution. This shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2609.01448 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.01448v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01448 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 279 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · 1 sept. 2026

What Is NISQ Quantum Computing: The Current Era of Quantum Machines
The Quantum Insider · 21 aug. 2026

IBM וקידמה טוענות ליתרון קוונטי שניתן לאמת
hayadan.org.il · 31 iul. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026