Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchSiguranță AI

analiza aiqbench

This research identifies a critical flaw in current Large Language Models where moral, grammatical, and economic value representations are conflated, causing non-moral tasks to be disproportionately influenced by moral constraints. The study demonstrates that this "value entanglement" can be mitigated through selective ablation of specific activation vectors associated with morality, offering a potential pathway for more nuanced alignment. For practitioners, this highlights the importance of disentangling distinct value systems during model training to ensure accurate performance across diverse functional domains.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv

Value Entanglement: Conflation Between Different Kinds of Good In (Some) Large Language Models

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2602.19101v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Value alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) requires us to empirically measure these models' actual, acquired representation of value. Among the characteristics of value representation in humans is that they distinguish among value of different kinds. We investigate whether LLMs likewise distinguish three different kinds of good: moral, grammatical, and economic. By probing model behavior, embeddings, and residual stream activations, we report pervasive cases of value entanglement: a conflation between these distinct representations of value. Specifically, both grammatical and economic valuation was found to be overly influenced by moral value, relative to human norms. This conflation was repaired by selective ablation of the activation vectors associated with morality.

Abstract:Value alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) requires us to empirically measure these models' actual, acquired representation of value. Among the characteristics of value representation in humans is that they distinguish among value of different kinds. We investigate whether LLMs likewise distinguish three different kinds of good: moral, grammatical, and economic. By probing model behavior, embeddings, and residual stream activations, we report pervasive cases of value entanglement: a conflation between these distinct representations of value. Specifically, both grammatical and economic valuation was found to be overly influenced by moral value, relative to human norms. This conflation was repaired by selective ablation of the activation vectors associated with morality.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2602.19101 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2602.19101v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.19101 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 204 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe