analiza aiqbench
This research exposes a critical flaw in current quantum readout error mitigation techniques that can artificially inflate fidelity estimates and generate false positives for entangled states. By conflating initialization errors with measurement noise, conventional methods exacerbate systematic biases rather than correcting them as qubit counts scale up. The study establishes necessary upper bounds on tolerable initialization error rates to ensure reliable benchmarking in noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices.
False Positives Raised by Quantum Readout Error Mitigation
arXiv:2510.08687v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantum readout error mitigation is essential for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices to achieve reliable data. The conventional approaches, conflating initialization errors with measurement errors, not only suppress the influence of measurement errors, but also strengthen that of initialization errors, which is a systematic bias grows exponentially with the qubit number. Here, we have proved that this effect causes severe fidelity overestimation for all stabilizer states and might lead to false positives in large-scale entangled state characterization. Similarly, the results from algorithms like the variational quantum eigensolver and time evolution also deviate negatively, and cover up other errors in the quantum circuit. These findings highlight the critical need for rigorous benchmarking and careful management of initialization errors. Consequently, we establish an upper bound for the tolerable initialization error rate to ensure effective error mitigation at a given system scale.
Abstract:Quantum readout error mitigation is essential for noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices to achieve reliable data. The conventional approaches, conflating initialization errors with measurement errors, not only suppress the influence of measurement errors, but also strengthen that of initialization errors, which is a systematic bias grows exponentially with the qubit number. Here, we have proved that this effect causes severe fidelity overestimation for all stabilizer states and might lead to false positives in large-scale entangled state characterization. Similarly, the results from algorithms like the variational quantum eigensolver and time evolution also deviate negatively, and cover up other errors in the quantum circuit. These findings highlight the critical need for rigorous benchmarking and careful management of initialization errors. Consequently, we establish an upper bound for the tolerable initialization error rate to ensure effective error mitigation at a given system scale.
arXiv:2510.08687 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2510.08687v5 [quant-ph] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 146 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026

Classiq designs circuits to track auxiliary qubit return to zero
Quantum Zeitgeist · 24 sept. 2026

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · 13 sept. 2026

IonQ Clears Last Regulatory Hurdle : SkyWater Closes Friday , Ending Foreign Chip Dependency
techtimes.com · 30 iul. 2026