analiza aiqbench
This research paper evaluates various machine learning models, including SVM, neural networks, and LightGBM, to optimize user-level handover decisions in wireless networks facing adverse propagation conditions. The study provides a technical comparison of classification and regression methods within network simulation environments, focusing on algorithmic efficiency and accuracy rather than consumer applications or broader AI societal impacts.
User-Level Handover Decision Making Based on Machine Learning Approaches
arXiv:2609.22593v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This letter covers a broad comparison of methods for classification and regression applications for a user-level handover decision making in scenarios with adverse propagation conditions involving buildings, coverage holes, and shadowing effects. The simulation campaigns are based on network simulator ns-3. The comparison encompasses classical machine learning approaches, such as KNN, SVM, and neural networks, but also state-of-the-art fuzzy logic systems and latter boosting machines. The results indicate that SVM and MLP are the most suitable for the classification of the best handover target, although fuzzy system SOFL can perform similarly with lower processing time. Additionally, for the download time estimation, LightGBM provides the smallest error with short processing time, even in hard propagation scenarios.
Abstract:This letter covers a broad comparison of methods for classification and regression applications for a user-level handover decision making in scenarios with adverse propagation conditions involving buildings, coverage holes, and shadowing effects. The simulation campaigns are based on network simulator ns-3. The comparison encompasses classical machine learning approaches, such as KNN, SVM, and neural networks, but also state-of-the-art fuzzy logic systems and latter boosting machines. The results indicate that SVM and MLP are the most suitable for the classification of the best handover target, although fuzzy system SOFL can perform similarly with lower processing time. Additionally, for the download time estimation, LightGBM provides the smallest error with short processing time, even in hard propagation scenarios.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
arXiv:2609.22593 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.22593v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22593 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.14209/jcis.2022.11 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 224 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Presentation: Architecting AI Systems for the Messy Reality of Enterprises: Why Agentic Compute is the Missing Layer
InfoQ · 3 aug. 2026

The SaaSpocalypse that wasn’t, with Atlassian CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes
The Verge · 28 sept. 2026

OpenRouter: from Seed to Stripe — with OpenRouter’s Alex Atallah & AMP’s Anjney Midha
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026