analiza aiqbench
This survey identifies critical gaps in current planetary robotics simulations, specifically noting a lack of open-source tools, limited coverage beyond rovers, and insufficient modeling of specialized sensors and operational constraints like energy limits. For the AI community, these findings highlight where synthetic data generation and perception algorithms must evolve to handle the harsh, unrepeatable conditions of space exploration effectively.
Simulation for Planetary Robotic Perception and Autonomy: A Concise Survey of Recent Capabilities and Gaps
arXiv:2609.34743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Planetary robotics is an important enabler of scientific exploration in environments where direct human-in-the-loop operation is costly, hazardous, or infeasible. However, developing and validating planetary robotic systems remains difficult because representative field testing is expensive, limited, and often unrepeatable under mission-relevant conditions. In this setting, simulation serves as a central tool for perception and autonomy research, synthetic data generation, system integration, and pre-deployment evaluation. Despite its importance, the literature on planetary robotics simulation remains dispersed across different simulation engines, implementations, and application settings. This paper surveys simulation works for planetary robotic perception and autonomy across four practical axes: Openness and Availability, Scenario and Platform Coverage, Sensor and Perception Support, and Environmental and Operational Realism. The surveyed simulation works report visual or physical fidelity and support perception-oriented workflows. They also indicate uneven public availability, rover-centered coverage, partial support for specialized sensing modalities, and uneven reporting of operational constraints such as onboard computation, energy, and communication restrictions.
Abstract:Planetary robotics is an important enabler of scientific exploration in environments where direct human-in-the-loop operation is costly, hazardous, or infeasible. However, developing and validating planetary robotic systems remains difficult because representative field testing is expensive, limited, and often unrepeatable under mission-relevant conditions. In this setting, simulation serves as a central tool for perception and autonomy research, synthetic data generation, system integration, and pre-deployment evaluation. Despite its importance, the literature on planetary robotics simulation remains dispersed across different simulation engines, implementations, and application settings. This paper surveys simulation works for planetary robotic perception and autonomy across four practical axes: Openness and Availability, Scenario and Platform Coverage, Sensor and Perception Support, and Environmental and Operational Realism. The surveyed simulation works report visual or physical fidelity and support perception-oriented workflows. They also indicate uneven public availability, rover-centered coverage, partial support for specialized sensing modalities, and uneven reporting of operational constraints such as onboard computation, energy, and communication restrictions.
8 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication at the 2026 International Conference on Space Robotics (iSpaRo)
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.34743 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.34743v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34743 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 266 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Import AI 471: Why Hugging Face worries me; space mining; FIve Eyes on AI
Import AI · 31 aug. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Space Robot Operations: Technologies, Challenges and Prospects
arXiv · 16 sept. 2026