analiza aiqbench
This paper refutes a recent claim regarding an exact equivalence between classical action and the Schrödinger equation by demonstrating that the proposed position-dependent time transformation violates the multivariable chain rule. Consequently, the spatial derivatives of the probability density amplitude do not vanish in the physical reference frame, reducing the authors' framework to the well-established semiclassical Van Vleck propagator, which is only exact for quadratic potentials. The analysis highlights the importance of rigorous mathematical consistency when proposing fundamental equivalences in quantum mechanics.
Reply to "Interpreting Bohm quantum potentials in `Computing quantum waves exactly from classical action'"
arXiv:2606.05197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The recent arXiv posting arXiv:2605.20443 by Lohmiller and Slotine attempts to address the omission of the Bohm quantum potential in their proposed exact equivalence between classical action and the Schr\"odinger equation. They introduce a position-dependent time transformation to argue that the spatial derivatives of the probability density amplitude vanish for the Feynman kernel. A rigorous mathematical examination of this transformation reveals a violation of the multivariable chain rule. The spatial derivatives do not vanish in the physical reference frame. The mathematical framework presented by the authors remains identical to the well-established semiclassical Van Vleck propagator, which is exact exclusively for quadratic potentials.
Abstract:The recent arXiv posting arXiv:2605.20443 by Lohmiller and Slotine attempts to address the omission of the Bohm quantum potential in their proposed exact equivalence between classical action and the Schrödinger equation. They introduce a position-dependent time transformation to argue that the spatial derivatives of the probability density amplitude vanish for the Feynman kernel. A rigorous mathematical examination of this transformation reveals a violation of the multivariable chain rule. The spatial derivatives do not vanish in the physical reference frame. The mathematical framework presented by the authors remains identical to the well-established semiclassical Van Vleck propagator, which is exact exclusively for quadratic potentials.
Comment on arXiv:2605.20443, 3 pages, no figures
arXiv:2606.05197 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2606.05197v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05197 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 198 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

David Bohm and Bohmian Mechanics
Quantum Zeitgeist · 14 iun. 2026
Interpreting Bohm-like quantum potentials in "Computing quantum waves exactly from classical action"
arXiv · 15 iun. 2026

Effect before cause : Understanding quantum retrocausality
sott.net · 1 aug. 2026
Interpreting Bohm-like quantum potentials in "Computing quantum waves exactly from classical action"
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026