analiza aiqbench
This research investigates the robustness of maximum-likelihood pairwise ranking mechanisms against coordinated perturbations, framing them as budgeted subset-selection problems. The study reveals that even minor, structured changes in comparison data can significantly alter output orderings, highlighting critical stability issues for systems relying on preference inference. These findings are essential for auditing the reliability and numerical stability of engineering applications built on comparison-driven decision support.
Perturbation Sensitivity of Maximum-Likelihood Pairwise Ranking in Computational Decision Systems
arXiv:2604.17805v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Maximum-likelihood pairwise ranking is a com- mon computational mechanism for prioritization, reputation estimation, and comparison-driven decision support. Despite its broad use, the perturbation sensitivity of this estimator under structured changes in comparison data remains insufficiently characterized. We study this question as an applied-mathematics and computational-science problem in stability analysis. We for- mulate coordinated perturbation as a budgeted subset-selection problem over pairwise observations and introduce an Adaptive Subset Selection Attack (ASSA) as a scalable search heuristic for probing high-impact perturbation sets. Through experiments on synthetic and observed preference datasets, we show that MLE-based ranking can exhibit pronounced regime-dependent sensitivity: relatively small but coordinated perturbations may in- duce meaningful changes in output orderings, while the response profile varies across budgets and data conditions. By comparing ASSA with random, greedy, and randomized subset baselines under repeated trials, we characterize both the magnitude and the variability of perturbation-induced ranking shifts. These results position pairwise ranking sensitivity as a problem in computational reliability, numerical stability, and robustness auditing for engineering systems built on comparison-driven inference.
Abstract:Maximum-likelihood pairwise ranking is a com- mon computational mechanism for prioritization, reputation estimation, and comparison-driven decision support. Despite its broad use, the perturbation sensitivity of this estimator under structured changes in comparison data remains insufficiently characterized. We study this question as an applied-mathematics and computational-science problem in stability analysis. We for- mulate coordinated perturbation as a budgeted subset-selection problem over pairwise observations and introduce an Adaptive Subset Selection Attack (ASSA) as a scalable search heuristic for probing high-impact perturbation sets. Through experiments on synthetic and observed preference datasets, we show that MLE-based ranking can exhibit pronounced regime-dependent sensitivity: relatively small but coordinated perturbations may in- duce meaningful changes in output orderings, while the response profile varies across budgets and data conditions. By comparing ASSA with random, greedy, and randomized subset baselines under repeated trials, we characterize both the magnitude and the variability of perturbation-induced ranking shifts. These results position pairwise ranking sensitivity as a problem in computational reliability, numerical stability, and robustness auditing for engineering systems built on comparison-driven inference.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
arXiv:2604.17805 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2604.17805v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.17805 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 271 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Ranking Abuse via Strategic Pairwise Data Perturbations
arXiv · 16 iun. 2026
HumorRank: A Tournament-Based Leaderboard for Evaluating Humor Generation in Large Language Models
arXiv · 31 iul. 2026

Quantum Voting System Shows Resilience to Noise on IBM Hardware
The Quantum Insider · 26 aug. 2026

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · 2 iun. 2026