analiza aiqbench
This study delivers critical empirical data on optimizing error mitigation and shot allocation strategies for superconducting quantum processors under strict execution budgets. By rigorously separating sampling uncertainty from device-induced noise across varying circuit depths, it clarifies the precise conditions where mitigation overhead yields tangible accuracy gains versus when finite-shot fluctuations negate those benefits. The findings offer essential guidance for researchers aiming to maximize fidelity on current IBM Quantum hardware without relying on unlimited sampling resources.
Hardware-Efficient Error Mitigation and Shot-Efficient Sampling on IBM Quantum Hardware
arXiv:2608.28535v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We experimentally study error mitigation and finite-shot sampling on superconducting quantum hardware under a constrained execution budget. The study combines calibration-aware qubit selection, circuit-depth scaling, zero-noise extrapolation, dynamical decoupling, readout-error mitigation, and repeated-shot estimation on an IBM Quantum processor. Experiments are organized across ideal simulation, noise-model simulation, and physical-device execution to separate sampling uncertainty from device-induced error. We investigate how mitigation performance changes with circuit depth, effective noise scale, qubit connectivity, and measurement budget, and quantify accuracy using expectation-value error, mean-squared error, statistical uncertainty, and mitigation gain. A fixed hardware-execution budget is used to evaluate shot allocation strategies and repeated measurements without relying on unlimited sampling. The resulting analysis provides a hardware-aware characterization of when mitigation improves expectation-value estimation and when finite-shot fluctuations offset the benefit of additional mitigation overhead. The implementation uses contemporary Qiskit and IBM Quantum Runtime workflows and is designed to provide reproducible experimental evidence for error-mitigation studies on current quantum processors.
Abstract:We experimentally study error mitigation and finite-shot sampling on superconducting quantum hardware under a constrained execution budget. The study combines calibration-aware qubit selection, circuit-depth scaling, zero-noise extrapolation, dynamical decoupling, readout-error mitigation, and repeated-shot estimation on an IBM Quantum processor. Experiments are organized across ideal simulation, noise-model simulation, and physical-device execution to separate sampling uncertainty from device-induced error. We investigate how mitigation performance changes with circuit depth, effective noise scale, qubit connectivity, and measurement budget, and quantify accuracy using expectation-value error, mean-squared error, statistical uncertainty, and mitigation gain. A fixed hardware-execution budget is used to evaluate shot allocation strategies and repeated measurements without relying on unlimited sampling. The resulting analysis provides a hardware-aware characterization of when mitigation improves expectation-value estimation and when finite-shot fluctuations offset the benefit of additional mitigation overhead. The implementation uses contemporary Qiskit and IBM Quantum Runtime workflows and is designed to provide reproducible experimental evidence for error-mitigation studies on current quantum processors.
16 pages, 9 figures, 6 tables. Experiments performed on IBM Quantum hardware using Qiskit 2.5.0 and Qiskit Runtime 0.48.0. Includes hardware calibration analysis, zero-noise extrapolation, dynamical decoupling, readout mitigation, adaptive shot allocation, repeated hardware experiments, and scaling studies
arXiv:2608.28535 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.28535v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28535 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 208 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026
DF-SQD: Deterministic Fields for Sampling-Based Quantum Diagonalization
arXiv · 2 sept. 2026

Classical shadows help quantum computer analyze a complex spin model
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 oct. 2026

Researchers Limit Quantum Noise Loss to Three Percentage Points
Quantum Zeitgeist · 4 oct. 2026