analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a hybrid quantum-classical framework using parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) to efficiently compute Bayes correlated equilibria in multi-agent systems where classical methods face exponential scaling issues. By reducing trainable parameters from $O(2^{2n})$ to $O(nL)$, the approach demonstrates improved social welfare over classical baselines like MCCFR for games with up to eight players, though it remains below exact linear programming optima. The study highlights a practical advantage of quantum approximation in handling incomplete information scenarios central to multi-agent AI and security applications.
Game, Set, Quantum: Parameterized Quantum Circuit for Correlated Equilibrium in Bayesian Games
arXiv:2606.03109v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Strategic decision-making among many agents under incomplete information is central to economics, security, and multi-agent artificial intelligence (AI). Computing equilibria in such settings is challenging because the joint type-action space grows exponentially with the number of players. In binary-type, binary-action Bayesian games with $n$ players, an explicit representation over type-action profiles requires $O(2^{2n})$ entries, making direct linear-programming (LP) formulations increasingly costly as $n$ grows. We propose a hybrid quantum-classical framework for approximating Bayes correlated equilibrium (BCE) using a parameterized quantum circuit (PQC). The PQC represents the conditional distribution over joint actions using $O(nL)$ trainable parameters, where $L$ denotes the circuit depth; for the largest trained setting, $n=8$ and $L=2$, this corresponds to $48$ trainable angles. Each player count is trained independently by maximizing expected social welfare with a penalty on positive aggregated BCE obedience violations. On a strategically coupled Bayesian congestion game with $n=2,4,6,8$ players, feasible PQC solutions attain higher welfare than MCCFR and DCFR product-strategy baselines while satisfying $\epsilon_{\max}\leq10^{-3}$, where $\epsilon_{\max}$ denotes the maximum positive aggregated BCE obedience violation. Across five independent runs per setting, all runs are feasible for $n=2,4,6$, while four of five are feasible for $n=8$. PQC welfare remains below the exact LP optimum, with the absolute gap increasing with $n$, while classical state-vector simulation prevents PQC training beyond eight players. These results demonstrate the use of a compact PQC parameterization for approximate equilibrium computation and quantify its welfare, feasibility, and classical simulation scaling on the studied benchmark.
Abstract:Strategic decision-making among many agents under incomplete information is central to economics, security, and multi-agent artificial intelligence (AI). Computing equilibria in such settings is challenging because the joint type-action space grows exponentially with the number of players. In binary-type, binary-action Bayesian games with $n$ players, an explicit representation over type-action profiles requires $O(2^{2n})$ entries, making direct linear-programming (LP) formulations increasingly costly as $n$ grows. We propose a hybrid quantum-classical framework for approximating Bayes correlated equilibrium (BCE) using a parameterized quantum circuit (PQC). The PQC represents the conditional distribution over joint actions using $O(nL)$ trainable parameters, where $L$ denotes the circuit depth; for the largest trained setting, $n=8$ and $L=2$, this corresponds to $48$ trainable angles. Each player count is trained independently by maximizing expected social welfare with a penalty on positive aggregated BCE obedience violations. On a strategically coupled Bayesian congestion game with $n=2,4,6,8$ players, feasible PQC solutions attain higher welfare than MCCFR and DCFR product-strategy baselines while satisfying $\epsilon_{\max}\leq10^{-3}$, where $\epsilon_{\max}$ denotes the maximum positive aggregated BCE obedience violation. Across five independent runs per setting, all runs are feasible for $n=2,4,6$, while four of five are feasible for $n=8$. PQC welfare remains below the exact LP optimum, with the absolute gap increasing with $n$, while classical state-vector simulation prevents PQC training beyond eight players. These results demonstrate the use of a compact PQC parameterization for approximate equilibrium computation and quantify its welfare, feasibility, and classical simulation scaling on the studied benchmark.
arXiv:2606.03109 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2606.03109v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03109 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 331 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Game, Set, Quantum: Parameterized Quantum Circuit for Correlated Equilibrium in Bayesian Games
arXiv · 3 iun. 2026

Universität zu Köln Team Achieves Quantum Game Advantage
Quantum Zeitgeist · 13 iul. 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · 29 mai 2026

A solvable quantum circuit’s limits define chaos
Quantum Zeitgeist · 4 oct. 2026