Sari la conținut

localeBeta.label localeBeta.notice localeBeta.readInEnglish

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This paper introduces Fisher-Geometric Pruning (FGP), a novel post-hoc framework for reducing structural complexity in genetic programming symbolic regression models. By leveraging local information geometry to identify and remove redundant parameters, FGP achieves significant model parsimony while maintaining or improving out-of-sample predictive accuracy. The approach offers a rigorous method for enhancing the interpretability of overparameterized expressions without sacrificing performance.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

From Overparameterised Expressions to Parsimonious Models: Fisher-Geometric Pruning for Symbolic Regression

arXiv1 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.24753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Genetic programming symbolic regression (GPSR) often returns expressions that are larger than necessary, with dormant branches and finely tuned algebraic configurations that fit sampling noise. Existing complexity-control strategies, such as multi-objective size-accuracy search or information criteria embedded in the fitness function, act on syntactic representations during model search. We introduce Fisher-Geometric pruning (FGP), a post-hoc model-reduction framework that acts on fitted models and can complement these techniques. FGP combines local information geometry at the maximum-likelihood solution with explicit compatibility tests for interpretable parametric boundaries. A taxonomy of parametric directions separates local sensitivity from proximity to reducible boundaries, enabling the treatment of unidentifiable directions and reductions through zero constraints, asymptotic limits, and signed parameter identifications. Candidate reductions are realised by symbolic contraction and refitting, then accepted only when their cross-validated predictive risk remains within a prescribed tolerance. We evaluate FGP on controlled diagnostic problems and Pareto fronts generated by GPSR. Across both settings, FGP substantially reduces structural complexity while preserving, and often improving, out-of-sample accuracy. Comparisons with competing pruning strategies and ablations show that, by combining geometric screening, boundary compatibility, and predictive validation, FGP yields the most consistent joint gains in parsimony and generalisation.

Citește articolul complet pe arXiv

Subiecte conexe