analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces a label-free, linear programming-based approach to dataset pruning that eliminates reliance on model training or embedding similarity assumptions. By reformulating unbiased subset selection as a variance minimization problem within a high-dimensional polytope, the method achieves superior accuracy at small data budgets across standard benchmarks like CIFAR-10 and MNIST. The framework also extends to reducing stochastic-gradient variance by enhancing mini-batch diversity without increasing batch size.
Dataset Pruning from First Principles: A Label-Free Linear Programming Approach
arXiv:2610.10347v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dataset pruning reduces a large training set to a representative subset while preserving model performance. Existing geometry-based methods typically assume that nearby points in embedding space share similar properties. Rather than imposing this assumption, we derive geometric selection criteria by reformulating unbiased subset selection as a variance minimization problem. Unbiasedness ensures that unweighted subset averages recover full-dataset averages in expectation, including losses and gradients at fixed model parameters. Specifically, we characterize a family of unbiased subset selection algorithms as a high-dimensional polytope. In this context, minimizing the expected sampling variance is a linear objective. Differences in sampling variance, averaged over rigid motions, admit closed-form pairwise expressions. Because the polytope has high dimension, directly applying standard linear programming is impractical. We instead use these expressions to construct an efficient vertex walk that optimizes an approximation of the variance objective while preserving unbiasedness, yielding a method that requires neither labels nor model training during selection. Across CIFAR-10, MNIST, and CelebA benchmarks, our method matches or exceeds uniform sampling in mean test accuracy at every evaluated budget and outperforms competing geometric methods in several settings, particularly at small selection budgets. Beyond dataset pruning, the same framework reduces stochastic-gradient variance by increasing diversity within mini-batches while keeping the batch size unchanged.
Abstract:Dataset pruning reduces a large training set to a representative subset while preserving model performance. Existing geometry-based methods typically assume that nearby points in embedding space share similar properties. Rather than imposing this assumption, we derive geometric selection criteria by reformulating unbiased subset selection as a variance minimization problem. Unbiasedness ensures that unweighted subset averages recover full-dataset averages in expectation, including losses and gradients at fixed model parameters. Specifically, we characterize a family of unbiased subset selection algorithms as a high-dimensional polytope. In this context, minimizing the expected sampling variance is a linear objective. Differences in sampling variance, averaged over rigid motions, admit closed-form pairwise expressions. Because the polytope has high dimension, directly applying standard linear programming is impractical. We instead use these expressions to construct an efficient vertex walk that optimizes an approximation of the variance objective while preserving unbiasedness, yielding a method that requires neither labels nor model training during selection. Across CIFAR-10, MNIST, and CelebA benchmarks, our method matches or exceeds uniform sampling in mean test accuracy at every evaluated budget and outperforms competing geometric methods in several settings, particularly at small selection budgets. Beyond dataset pruning, the same framework reduces stochastic-gradient variance by increasing diversity within mini-batches while keeping the batch size unchanged.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.10347 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.10347v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10347 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 304 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · 23 iul. 2026

Generalization and infinite width
LessWrong · 1 aug. 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026
How to build a cancer vaccine, and whether they will work this time
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026