În afara temei aiqbench
Această știre a fost preluată de la o sursă pe care o urmărim, dar nu ține de domeniul AI sau cuantic, așa că nu există o perspectivă aiqbench pentru ea.
Efficient Bezier Velocity Optimization for Free-Floating Space Manipulators
arXiv:2609.31880v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present FAVOR (Free-floating Arm Velocity Optimization with Recursive Sensitivities), a planner for collision-free reaching, tracking, and prescribed-time pre-grasp interception on an unactuated spacecraft. It optimizes Bezier joint-velocity curves with linear velocity, acceleration, and continuity constraints. Decision dimension is independent of rollout resolution. Analytical recursive sensitivities provide task and clearance gradients through the coupled base-arm motion. Parallel evaluation, caching, and incremental collision discovery reduce computation. With a seven-DoF arm and five simulated spacecraft models, FAVOR achieves 99.8% point-to-point success with 1.779 s mean computation, versus 62.9% and 50.270 s for an IK-initialized position-spline baseline. Means include failures and timeouts. FAVOR completes 30 of 36 tracking cases, versus 15 for single-step QP, and all 36 interception instances, versus 22 for the spline baseline. A controlled ablation shows that finite differences increase mean planning time 4.7-fold.
Abstract:We present FAVOR (Free-floating Arm Velocity Optimization with Recursive Sensitivities), a planner for collision-free reaching, tracking, and prescribed-time pre-grasp interception on an unactuated spacecraft. It optimizes Bezier joint-velocity curves with linear velocity, acceleration, and continuity constraints. Decision dimension is independent of rollout resolution. Analytical recursive sensitivities provide task and clearance gradients through the coupled base-arm motion. Parallel evaluation, caching, and incremental collision discovery reduce computation. With a seven-DoF arm and five simulated spacecraft models, FAVOR achieves 99.8% point-to-point success with 1.779 s mean computation, versus 62.9% and 50.270 s for an IK-initialized position-spline baseline. Means include failures and timeouts. FAVOR completes 30 of 36 tracking cases, versus 15 for single-step QP, and all 36 interception instances, versus 22 for the spline baseline. A controlled ablation shows that finite differences increase mean planning time 4.7-fold.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.31880 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.31880v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31880 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 227 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · 19 sept. 2026
Task-Space Constrained Stochastic Trajectory Optimization for Time-Optimal Forestry Crane Motion Planning
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026
More than a Manipulator: Planning Propellant-Free Attitude Maneuvers for Free-Floating Spacecraft
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026