analiza aiqbench
This study reveals that the edge of stability acts as a selective mechanism rather than a global constraint, redistributing learning progress based on gradient alignment with top Hessian eigenvectors and sustained magnitude. By causally isolating these conditions, the research explains why confidently classified groups may stagnate while outliers benefit, offering a precise framework for understanding optimization dynamics. These findings provide actionable insights for practitioners aiming to control learning allocation across different data subsets during training.
Edge of Stability Selectively Shapes Learning Across the Data Distribution
arXiv:2606.04212v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing analyses of the edge of stability (EoS) treat it as a global property of optimization. We show that it is also selective: the stability constraint redistributes learning across subsets of the training distribution, amplifying progress on some groups while suppressing progress on others. Using a branching intervention that enters or exits the EoS regime from the same training state, we causally demonstrate this trade-off and identify two necessary conditions for a group to benefit. First, its aggregate gradient must align with the top Hessian eigenvector. We isolate this mechanism with a controlled perturbation that preserves distance but randomizes direction, destroying alignment and eliminating the advantage. Second, the group must sustain non-vanishing gradient magnitude over time. Under cross-entropy loss, gradient saturation decouples confidently classified groups, shifting the advantage to output-outliers, whose gradients persist. Together, these results show that EoS functions not only as a stability boundary, but as a mechanism governing the allocation of learning across the data distribution.
Abstract:Existing analyses of the edge of stability (EoS) treat it as a global property of optimization. We show that it is also selective: the stability constraint redistributes learning across subsets of the training distribution, amplifying progress on some groups while suppressing progress on others. Using a branching intervention that enters or exits the EoS regime from the same training state, we causally demonstrate this trade-off and identify two necessary conditions for a group to benefit. First, its aggregate gradient must align with the top Hessian eigenvector. We isolate this mechanism with a controlled perturbation that preserves distance but randomizes direction, destroying alignment and eliminating the advantage. Second, the group must sustain non-vanishing gradient magnitude over time. Under cross-entropy loss, gradient saturation decouples confidently classified groups, shifting the advantage to output-outliers, whose gradients persist. Together, these results show that EoS functions not only as a stability boundary, but as a mechanism governing the allocation of learning across the data distribution.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2606.04212 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.04212v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04212 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 254 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Edge of Stability Selectively Shapes Learning Across the Data Distribution
arXiv · 5 iun. 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · 21 mai 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026