analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical flaw in Random Forest variable importance metrics, where high correlations among predictors often mask the true significance of specific features. By introducing grouping methods based on conditional correlations, the proposed approach effectively corrects these scores to prevent the masking of important variables. This methodological improvement is particularly relevant for practitioners relying on RF for model interpretation, feature selection, and diagnosis in complex datasets.
Correcting Variable Importance Scored by Random Forests
arXiv:2606.10770v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Variable importance produced by Random Forests (RF) is used widely in statistical data analysis, and has played an important role in a variety of tasks such as assisting model interpretation, model selection and diagnosis, and cost-bounded learning etc. However, the calculation of variable importance in RF does not take into account of the correlations among variables, and variables that are correlated to many other variables tend to receive a lower importance index or being completely masked (i.e., with an importance index near zero) by other strongly correlated variables. To prevent influence from unwanted correlated variables in calculating variable importance, we propose to group variables by their conditional correlations (conditional on the response variable). We explore two computationally efficient options, with one grouping variables individually, and then separates the variable of interest from all correlated variables, while the other uses clustering to group variables according to their pair-wise conditional correlations. Our experiments show that both lead to sensible corrections to the importance of variables.
Abstract:Variable importance produced by Random Forests (RF) is used widely in statistical data analysis, and has played an important role in a variety of tasks such as assisting model interpretation, model selection and diagnosis, and cost-bounded learning etc. However, the calculation of variable importance in RF does not take into account of the correlations among variables, and variables that are correlated to many other variables tend to receive a lower importance index or being completely masked (i.e., with an importance index near zero) by other strongly correlated variables. To prevent influence from unwanted correlated variables in calculating variable importance, we propose to group variables by their conditional correlations (conditional on the response variable). We explore two computationally efficient options, with one grouping variables individually, and then separates the variable of interest from all correlated variables, while the other uses clustering to group variables according to their pair-wise conditional correlations. Our experiments show that both lead to sensible corrections to the importance of variables.
Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.10770 [stat.ME]
(or arXiv:2606.10770v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10770 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 259 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026
Just add noise: Debiasing tree-based variable importance in mixed data
arXiv · 15 sept. 2026

Promptimus: Improving already good LLM prompts with zero manual engineering
Amazon Science · 14 mai 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026