Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research addresses a specific theoretical bias in tree-based models where continuous variables are unfairly prioritized over categorical ones, offering a noise-injection remedy to ensure fair variable importance scoring. By combining this correction with stability selection, the authors provide a robust method for accurate feature selection across mixed data types without relying on hyperparameter tuning. This work is essential for practitioners deploying random forests and similar algorithms in production environments where interpretability and fairness are critical.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Just add noise: Debiasing tree-based variable importance in mixed data

arXiv1 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.14083v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Variable importance scores from tree-based methods such as random forests favor continuous predictors over categorical ones. We present a theoretical analysis of this bias and propose a simple remedy: add a small amount of noise to each categorical predictor. The correction is demonstrated on a variety of simulated and real-world datasets and combined with integrated path stability selection to perform variable selection with false discovery control for mixed data.

Abstract:Variable importance scores from tree-based methods such as random forests favor continuous predictors over categorical ones. We present a theoretical analysis of this bias and propose a simple remedy: add a small amount of noise to each categorical predictor. The correction is demonstrated on a variety of simulated and real-world datasets and combined with integrated path stability selection to perform variable selection with false discovery control for mixed data.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)

arXiv:2609.14083 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2609.14083v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14083 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 168 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe