analiza aiqbench
This research addresses the critical gap between raw language model output probabilities and reliable uncertainty estimates over meaningful real-world states like diagnoses or economic hypotheses. By introducing a "semantic map," the authors provide a statistical framework to calibrate these outputs, ensuring that professional applications maintain stability regardless of prompt phrasing while offering auditable posterior bounds. This work advances machine learning methodology by transforming semantic instability into a testable inference problem rather than an incidental limitation.
Calibrating Semantic Uncertainty from Observable Language-Model Probabilities
arXiv:2607.17447v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models produce probabilities over words, but professional decisions require uncertainty over meaningful states such as diagnoses, hypotheses or operational conditions. A model's printed numerical confidence does not establish reliability. We introduce a semantic map: a prespecified, testable bridge from probabilities over verbal responses to probabilities over declared states, formulated as semiparametric inference for a finite-valued latent state. A reference model defines the target posterior, the language model supplies an unrestricted conditional distribution over verbal responses, and held-out calibration connects them. We derive posterior-error bounds and conditions for existence, uniqueness, stability and sequential Bayesian updating. Crucially, language probabilities depend on the prompt's lexical form, whereas the target posterior is unchanged by information-equivalent rewording. We test the method on professional market text compiled from Federal Reserve economic and financial series and on controlled simulations with exact posteriors. Across two fitted language models, language-derived probabilities outperform printed numerical probabilities, recover held-out posteriors with valid uncertainty coverage, remain largely stable under paraphrasing, and respond appropriately to altered evidence. The broader implication is that prompt engineering optimizes a wording-dependent response, whereas scientific and professional use requires validated stability of application-relevant meaning. The semantic map turns this general concern into a testable statistical problem and, when its acceptance conditions hold, yields an auditable posterior estimate. The same principle offers a template for auditing classifications, recommendations and other fluent responses that may conceal semantic instability.
Abstract:Language models produce probabilities over words, but professional decisions require uncertainty over meaningful states such as diagnoses, hypotheses or operational conditions. A model's printed numerical confidence does not establish reliability. We introduce a semantic map: a prespecified, testable bridge from probabilities over verbal responses to probabilities over declared states, formulated as semiparametric inference for a finite-valued latent state. A reference model defines the target posterior, the language model supplies an unrestricted conditional distribution over verbal responses, and held-out calibration connects them. We derive posterior-error bounds and conditions for existence, uniqueness, stability and sequential Bayesian updating. Crucially, language probabilities depend on the prompt's lexical form, whereas the target posterior is unchanged by information-equivalent rewording. We test the method on professional market text compiled from Federal Reserve economic and financial series and on controlled simulations with exact posteriors. Across two fitted language models, language-derived probabilities outperform printed numerical probabilities, recover held-out posteriors with valid uncertainty coverage, remain largely stable under paraphrasing, and respond appropriately to altered evidence. The broader implication is that prompt engineering optimizes a wording-dependent response, whereas scientific and professional use requires validated stability of application-relevant meaning. The semantic map turns this general concern into a testable statistical problem and, when its acceptance conditions hold, yields an auditable posterior estimate. The same principle offers a template for auditing classifications, recommendations and other fluent responses that may conceal semantic instability.
Methodology (stat.ME); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
G.3; I.2.6; I.2.7; I.5.1
arXiv:2607.17447 [stat.ME]
(or arXiv:2607.17447v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17447 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 336 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Language as a Sensor: Calibrated Spatial Belief Estimation in 3D Scenes from Natural Language
arXiv · 9 iun. 2026
Foundations of Stochastic Lexical Calculus: Semantic Descent and Random Dynamics on Probability Simplices
arXiv · 18 sept. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026
FinBench: Time-Gated Calibration and Uncertainty Benchmarking for Agentic Financial Forecasting
arXiv · 21 iul. 2026