Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This paper proposes a rigorous mathematical framework to determine when Large Language Model outputs can be treated as valid sequential states for scientific inference, rather than just prompt-dependent word probabilities. By establishing conditions for stability and coverage on probability simplices, the authors provide necessary constraints for using language models in dynamic systems where evidence must update meaningful states over time.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist, InfoQ
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Foundations of Stochastic Lexical Calculus: Semantic Descent and Random Dynamics on Probability Simplices

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.20207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models produce prompt-dependent probabilities over words, whereas scientific systems require uncertainty over meaningful states that can be updated as evidence arrives. We develop an observable framework for determining when language-derived probabilities support such a sequential state representation. Theoretically, we define typed measurable transformations of contextual language, construct a minimal closed representation, and give necessary and sufficient conditions for semantic updates to exist uniquely. We bound irreducible nonclosure and accumulated error, and under average contraction prove existence, uniqueness and stability of an external random recursion on a probability simplex. These results define a stochastic lexical calculus without attributing an internal calculus to the language model. Empirically, frozen experiments test the observable implications. Raw prompt-conditioned probabilities fail the prespecified invariance gate; after prompt-specific calibration, a common three-state representation passes the stability gates and covers 28 of 30 untouched eight-step paths, or 0.933 at nominal level 0.90. Accordingly, language probabilities support a stochastic state only conditionally on verified closure, stability and coverage within a declared operating domain.

Abstract:Large language models produce prompt-dependent probabilities over words, whereas scientific systems require uncertainty over meaningful states that can be updated as evidence arrives. We develop an observable framework for determining when language-derived probabilities support such a sequential state representation. Theoretically, we define typed measurable transformations of contextual language, construct a minimal closed representation, and give necessary and sufficient conditions for semantic updates to exist uniquely. We bound irreducible nonclosure and accumulated error, and under average contraction prove existence, uniqueness and stability of an external random recursion on a probability simplex. These results define a stochastic lexical calculus without attributing an internal calculus to the language model. Empirically, frozen experiments test the observable implications. Raw prompt-conditioned probabilities fail the prespecified invariance gate; after prompt-specific calibration, a common three-state representation passes the stability gates and covers 28 of 30 untouched eight-step paths, or 0.933 at nominal level 0.90. Accordingly, language probabilities support a stochastic state only conditionally on verified closure, stability and coverage within a declared operating domain.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Category Theory (math.CT); Probability (math.PR); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2609.20207 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.20207v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20207 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 269 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe