analiza aiqbench
This research resolves a longstanding open question by proving that quantum blind-unforgeability is strictly stronger than plus-one unforgeability, establishing a definitive hierarchy in quantum signature security. The authors introduce a novel "smoothing" technique that coherently rescales query histories to transform attackers with minimal loss, marking a conceptual shift from previous extraction-based approaches that fail in general cases. This advancement refines the theoretical foundations of post-quantum cryptography and offers new tools for analyzing black-box quantum-query algorithms.
Blind Unforgeability implies Plus-One Unforgeability
arXiv:2610.00517v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We prove that quantum blind-unforgeability implies quantum plus-one unforgeability, settling an open question in the literature. Since plus-one unforgeability is known not to imply blind-unforgeability, our result establishes that blind-unforgeability is \emph{strictly stronger} than plus-one unforgeability in the quantum setting. The implication is proven using a new \emph{smoothing} technique that coherently rescales the query histories of a quantum-query algorithm in a black-box manner. This enables us to transform any successful plus-one attacker into a blind-unforgeability attacker with only inverse-polynomial loss. Our proof represents a conceptual shift from merely extracting a useful query history as in earlier attempts, which we show inevitably fails in general, to first coherently reshaping how query histories interfere.
Abstract:We prove that quantum blind-unforgeability implies quantum plus-one unforgeability, settling an open question in the literature. Since plus-one unforgeability is known not to imply blind-unforgeability, our result establishes that blind-unforgeability is \emph{strictly stronger} than plus-one unforgeability in the quantum setting. The implication is proven using a new \emph{smoothing} technique that coherently rescales the query histories of a quantum-query algorithm in a black-box manner. This enables us to transform any successful plus-one attacker into a blind-unforgeability attacker with only inverse-polynomial loss. Our proof represents a conceptual shift from merely extracting a useful query history as in earlier attempts, which we show inevitably fails in general, to first coherently reshaping how query histories interfere.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2610.00517 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.00517v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00517 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 210 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

[AINews] Claude Opus 5.5, the new default model for AINews — and everybody cuts prices 40-50%
Latent Space · 23 sept. 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026

Hint-based CoT faithfulness evals still mostly work on Claude
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026