analiza aiqbench
The paper proposes metrics for judging how well binary sparse codes preserve input similarity structure, a property the field has lacked a shared definition for. Its comparison of four methods suggests a real trade-off: high information preservation tends to come with lower sparsity, and vice versa. For ML readers, the reusable evaluation framework matters more than the specific rankings, since it offers a common basis for comparing representation-learning methods across theoretical, backprop-trained, and Hebbian approaches.
Binary Sparse Codes: Where are we on Energy Efficient Representations?
arXiv:2610.41933v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Biological neural systems achieve impressive computational capabilities under tight metabolic constraints, relying on sparse cortical representations that minimise total neural activity. This combination of efficiency and representational power has motivated growing interest in sparse coding as a computational strategy for artificial systems. Artificial models designed to produce binary sparse codes span three broad paradigms, theoretical methods grounded in efficient coding, deep learning methods trained via backpropagation, and biologically plausible methods that learn through local Hebbian rules, each yielding codes whose quality depends not only on achieving low activation density but also on preserving the informational structure of the input. The latter property, however, lacks an agreed-upon quantitative definition, leaving the field without a principled basis for comparing methods. We propose a set of metrics that formalise information preservation as similarity preservation, measuring how faithfully a binary sparse code reproduces the relational geometry of the input space, and apply this framework to compare four representative methods under matched conditions. The results reveal a consistent trade-off in which models that achieve high information preservation do so at the cost of sparsity, while models approaching the uniformity of an optimal random sparse code tend to sacrifice it. Competitive Sparse Codes, a biologically plausible approach, is the only architecture to occupy a region of near-maximal sparsity while retaining meaningful information preservation. These findings frame the simultaneous satisfaction of both factors as an open challenge for the field and provide a reusable evaluation framework for measuring progress toward it.
Title:Binary Sparse Codes: Where are we on Energy Efficient Representations?
Abstract:Biological neural systems achieve impressive computational capabilities under tight metabolic constraints, relying on sparse cortical representations that minimise total neural activity. This combination of efficiency and representational power has motivated growing interest in sparse coding as a computational strategy for artificial systems. Artificial models designed to produce binary sparse codes span three broad paradigms, theoretical methods grounded in efficient coding, deep learning methods trained via backpropagation, and biologically plausible methods that learn through local Hebbian rules, each yielding codes whose quality depends not only on achieving low activation density but also on preserving the informational structure of the input. The latter property, however, lacks an agreed-upon quantitative definition, leaving the field without a principled basis for comparing methods. We propose a set of metrics that formalise information preservation as similarity preservation, measuring how faithfully a binary sparse code reproduces the relational geometry of the input space, and apply this framework to compare four representative methods under matched conditions. The results reveal a consistent trade-off in which models that achieve high information preservation do so at the cost of sparsity, while models approaching the uniformity of an optimal random sparse code tend to sacrifice it. Competitive Sparse Codes, a biologically plausible approach, is the only architecture to occupy a region of near-maximal sparsity while retaining meaningful information preservation. These findings frame the simultaneous satisfaction of both factors as an open challenge for the field and provide a reusable evaluation framework for measuring progress toward it.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.41933 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.41933v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41933 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 348 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Entropy-Punctured Bloom Filters for Memory-Efficient Machine Learning
arXiv · 16 sept. 2026
Going deep, reaching further: What can Boltzmann machines efficiently represent?
arXiv · 30 oct. 2026
Long-term Traffic Scene Prediction via Polynomial Representations in Autonomous Driving
arXiv · 5 aug. 2026
HIGS: Hierarchical Implicit Grids for Joint Geometric and Semantic Scene Understanding
arXiv · 1 oct. 2026