Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

The paper tests whether two structured decision models, Jev and Clef-Flash, can do defect inspection with only two reference images per class, where they report higher accuracy than CLIP on the same references (0.75-1.00 and 0.71-0.99 vs 0.67-0.84). The gains rest on five manufacturing case studies and self-reported benchmarks, so they need independent replication before generalizing. For readers building inspection systems, the more transferable pieces are the probability calibration, which improved Brier scores in 13 of 15 configurations, and the agentic refinement of text prompts.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv

Beyond CLIP: Calibrated (Few-Shot) Defect Detection With System One Decision Models

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2610.41199v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cameras and vision sensors are widely used for product and process inspection in manufacturing environments. Traditionally, this process required thousands of images of both nominal and defective products to train such models. Recent research shows that vision transformer (ViT) models, such as CLIP, can reduce this requirement to 50-100 images per nominal and defective class. However, collecting even 50 defective images can be difficult in high-yield or low-volume manufacturing processes. In this paper, we examine the utility of two recently proposed structured decision models (Jev and Clef-Flash) in applications using as few as k=2 reference images per class at inference. In the process, we provide three main contributions: (a) a framework for k-shot learning of these models for image classification/inspection applications; (b) an agentic approach for automatically refining the text descriptions that guide image classification in these decision models; and (c) an approach to calibrate the resulting defect probabilities to improve their reliability for inspection decisions. We test these contributions in five manufacturing case studies. Using two reference images per class, both Jev and Clef-Flash outperform CLIP's test accuracies with the same references (0.75-1.00 [Jev] and 0.71-0.99 [Clef-Flash] vs 0.67-0.84 [CLIP]). Furthermore, we show that our agentic refinement of text descriptions significantly improves accuracy across 6 of 8 model-application combinations, and our calibration approach reduces the Brier score in 13 of the 15 model-application configurations. To support the reproducibility of our work, we provide our replication code and have created the R "decisions" package for evaluating additional models. We also provide a publicly available web app that allows practitioners to inspect their own images with no code.

Abstract:Cameras and vision sensors are widely used for product and process inspection in manufacturing environments. Traditionally, this process required thousands of images of both nominal and defective products to train such models. Recent research shows that vision transformer (ViT) models, such as CLIP, can reduce this requirement to 50-100 images per nominal and defective class. However, collecting even 50 defective images can be difficult in high-yield or low-volume manufacturing processes. In this paper, we examine the utility of two recently proposed structured decision models (Jev and Clef-Flash) in applications using as few as k=2 reference images per class at inference. In the process, we provide three main contributions: (a) a framework for k-shot learning of these models for image classification/inspection applications; (b) an agentic approach for automatically refining the text descriptions that guide image classification in these decision models; and (c) an approach to calibrate the resulting defect probabilities to improve their reliability for inspection decisions. We test these contributions in five manufacturing case studies. Using two reference images per class, both Jev and Clef-Flash outperform CLIP's test accuracies with the same references (0.75-1.00 [Jev] and 0.71-0.99 [Clef-Flash] vs 0.67-0.84 [CLIP]). Furthermore, we show that our agentic refinement of text descriptions significantly improves accuracy across 6 of 8 model-application combinations, and our calibration approach reduces the Brier score in 13 of the 15 model-application configurations. To support the reproducibility of our work, we provide our replication code and have created the R "decisions" package for evaluating additional models. We also provide a publicly available web app that allows practitioners to inspect their own images with no code.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.41199 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.41199v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41199 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 367 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe