analiza aiqbench
This research extends spatial fairness metrics in predictive modeling to account for individual movement patterns rather than just static residence locations. By utilizing multi-resolution spatial scan statistics on synthetic datasets, the authors demonstrate an effective method for detecting algorithmic bias embedded within dynamic mobility data. This work is significant for developers of location-aware AI systems aiming to ensure equitable treatment across diverse geographic behaviors and trajectories.
Assessing Predictive Models for Fairness Based on Movement Patterns
arXiv:2605.23234v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Assessing the spatial fairness of predictive models involves establishing whether they are statistically penalizing (favoring) individuals associated with certain geographical locations. Literature on this topic makes the fundamental assumption that each individual is assigned to a single geographical location (e.g., place of residence). However, fairness with respect to the set of locations where one has been, i.e., their movement patterns over different regions, also matters when fairness is considered. Consequently, we argue that it is necessary to generalize the notion of spatial fairness to also include movement patterns, leading to the novel problem of assessing predictive models for fairness relative to the movements of individuals. To deal with this problem, we propose an approach that first associates the movements of individuals to certain geographic regions, considering multiple spatial partitions with different resolutions and alignments, and then employs a suitable spatial scan statistic to assess whether a predictive model is fair based on movement patterns. In the experimental evaluation, we study the performance of our approach over thousands of synthetic unfair datasets, showing that it is effective at detecting this new type of unfairness and at retrieving the set of objects treated unfairly, while localization performance exhibits a consistent multi-resolution trade-off.
Abstract:Assessing the spatial fairness of predictive models involves establishing whether they are statistically penalizing (favoring) individuals associated with certain geographical locations. Literature on this topic makes the fundamental assumption that each individual is assigned to a single geographical location (e.g., place of residence). However, fairness with respect to the set of locations where one has been, i.e., their movement patterns over different regions, also matters when fairness is considered. Consequently, we argue that it is necessary to generalize the notion of spatial fairness to also include movement patterns, leading to the novel problem of assessing predictive models for fairness relative to the movements of individuals. To deal with this problem, we propose an approach that first associates the movements of individuals to certain geographic regions, considering multiple spatial partitions with different resolutions and alignments, and then employs a suitable spatial scan statistic to assess whether a predictive model is fair based on movement patterns. In the experimental evaluation, we study the performance of our approach over thousands of synthetic unfair datasets, showing that it is effective at detecting this new type of unfairness and at retrieving the set of objects treated unfairly, while localization performance exhibits a consistent multi-resolution trade-off.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2605.23234 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.23234v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 215 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Assessing Predictive Models for Fairness Based on Activity-Space Patterns
arXiv · 11 sept. 2026

How to Use a Small Vision Model as a Filter for an AI Agent
Roboflow Blog · 29 oct. 2026
"Mirror" Large Language Model Evaluations of Depression are Criterion Contaminated
arXiv · 11 sept. 2026
Man and machine: artificial intelligence and judicial decision making
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026