analiza aiqbench
This research proposes a formal framework using epistemic temporal logic to specify and verify explainability as a positive information flow within multi-agent systems. The study balances this requirement against negative information flows that could compromise privacy, offering an algorithmic approach to validate these properties on finite-state models. By distinguishing between explainable and unexplainable systems through counterfactual reasoning, the work provides a rigorous method for integrating transparency guarantees into system-level requirements.
An Information-Flow Perspective on Explainability Requirements: Specification and Verification
arXiv:2509.01479v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Explainable systems expose information about why certain observed effects are happening to the agents interacting with them. We argue that this constitutes a positive flow of information that needs to be specified, verified, and balanced against negative information flow that may, e.g., violate privacy guarantees. Since both explainability and privacy require reasoning about knowledge, we tackle these tasks with epistemic temporal logic extended with quantification over counterfactual causes. This allows us to specify that a multi-agent system exposes enough information such that agents acquire knowledge on why some effect occurred. We show how this principle can be used to specify explainability as a system-level requirement and provide an algorithm for checking finite-state models against such specifications. We present a prototype implementation of the algorithm and evaluate it on several benchmarks, illustrating how our approach distinguishes between explainable and unexplainable systems, and how it allows to pose additional privacy requirements.
Abstract:Explainable systems expose information about why certain observed effects are happening to the agents interacting with them. We argue that this constitutes a positive flow of information that needs to be specified, verified, and balanced against negative information flow that may, e.g., violate privacy guarantees. Since both explainability and privacy require reasoning about knowledge, we tackle these tasks with epistemic temporal logic extended with quantification over counterfactual causes. This allows us to specify that a multi-agent system exposes enough information such that agents acquire knowledge on why some effect occurred. We show how this principle can be used to specify explainability as a system-level requirement and provide an algorithm for checking finite-state models against such specifications. We present a prototype implementation of the algorithm and evaluate it on several benchmarks, illustrating how our approach distinguishes between explainable and unexplainable systems, and how it allows to pose additional privacy requirements.
Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2509.01479 [cs.LO]
(or arXiv:2509.01479v3 [cs.LO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.01479 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 246 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] OpenAI reports Navier-Stokes singularity find in 88 hours using Astra-next, roughly 10,000 agents and 130B tokens (>$40M), a contender for second ever Millennium Prize awarded
Latent Space · 9 sept. 2026

Claude Code’s Next Era — Thariq Shihipar, Anthropic
Latent Space · 29 sept. 2026

Scaling medical content review at Flo Health with Amazon Bedrock – Part 2
AWS · 14 iul. 2026

Presentation: Beyond Observability: Evolving Production Operations in the Age of AI
InfoQ · 1 oct. 2026