analiza aiqbench
This paper addresses safety guarantees for frozen adaptive cruise control policies by introducing a residual-aware conformal filtering method that adjusts operating margins without retraining the underlying model. The approach demonstrates significant improvements in episode safety and rollout efficiency compared to standard constrained baseline methods, offering a practical solution for deploying pre-trained AI controllers in dynamic environments.
Adaptive Safety Filtering for Frozen ACC Policies via Conformal Residual Calibration
arXiv:2609.35415v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frozen adaptive cruise control (ACC) policies can violate constraints when deployment dynamics differ from their training conditions. We propose residual-aware conformal action filtering (RACF), which calibrates residuals of a fixed nominal predictor and converts their quantile into an operating margin for finite-model action projection. Completed transitions update margins and candidate selection without retraining the policy. In a registered comparison over 2,400 controller-trial units, Adaptive RACF achieves 94.3% episode safety, improving by 19.9 percentage points over the evaluated nominal CBF-QP baseline while reducing projection frequency from 8.11% to 6.63%. A controlled study isolates a 4.54-point improvement from residual-margin injection. In a separate matched-hardware evaluation, Adaptive reduces mean amortized rollout time by 21.2% relative to Robust CBF-QP, with 161/180 versus 170/180 safe episodes. We characterize conditions linking one-step residual coverage to constraint satisfaction and quantify the observed safety-computation trade-offs.
Abstract:Frozen adaptive cruise control (ACC) policies can violate constraints when deployment dynamics differ from their training conditions. We propose residual-aware conformal action filtering (RACF), which calibrates residuals of a fixed nominal predictor and converts their quantile into an operating margin for finite-model action projection. Completed transitions update margins and candidate selection without retraining the policy. In a registered comparison over 2,400 controller-trial units, Adaptive RACF achieves 94.3% episode safety, improving by 19.9 percentage points over the evaluated nominal CBF-QP baseline while reducing projection frequency from 8.11% to 6.63%. A controlled study isolates a 4.54-point improvement from residual-margin injection. In a separate matched-hardware evaluation, Adaptive reduces mean amortized rollout time by 21.2% relative to Robust CBF-QP, with 161/180 versus 170/180 safe episodes. We characterize conditions linking one-step residual coverage to constraint satisfaction and quantify the observed safety-computation trade-offs.
Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2609.35415 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.35415v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35415 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 240 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
When World Models Lie: Adaptive Safety Analysis Under Wrong Imaginations
arXiv · 29 sept. 2026

Improving CoT Monitorability of Evaluation Awareness via Verbalization Training
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026
Introducing Shieldstral.
Mistral AI · 4 aug. 2026
Uncovering Vulnerability of Vision-Language-Action Models under Joint-Level Physical Faults
arXiv · 10 iun. 2026