analiza aiqbench
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
A Living Leaderboard for Graph Machine Learning
arXiv:2611.03433v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph machine learning benchmarking results are scattered across papers that use quite different sets of datasets and baseline methods, making it difficult to tell whether a reported gain reflects architectural progress or merely an outdated comparison or weakly tuned baseline. We introduce a living, graph-learning-specific leaderboard that organizes reported results by dataset, putting new results into context. As of 15 October 2026 our LLM-based extraction pipeline extracted 27,723 eligible results across 111 datasets from 885 peer-reviewed papers. Our analysis of these results quantifies concerns about graph-learning benchmarking: legacy datasets are still actively used and many result tables contain baseline results that are drastically lower than those already available in the literature, e.g. 45% Amazon-ratings tables and 37% for Peptides-struct. The leaderboard allows to quickly compare new results against compatible prior results, aiming to improve the overall quality of graph learning benchmarking.
Citește articolul complet pe arXivSubiecte conexe
Rank Intervals for Leaderboards: A Hierarchical Framework for Model Evaluation
arXiv · 9 iun. 2026
An Embarrassingly Simple Rule-based Visiting Circulation Approach to Trip Destination Prediction
arXiv · 29 iul. 2026
Training Witnesses: Trusting the Training without Trusting the Trainer
arXiv · 30 sept. 2026
Measuring the Checker: Mutation Analysis for GPU-Kernel Benchmark Oracles
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026