Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
49,484 skills from 2,391 repositories · updated 3 minutes ago
48,444 skills
- icdt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what counts as evidence for an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) result — matching-bound complexity analysis as the primary evidence, worked examples and counterexamples that establish separations, and, only for papers with an algorithmic contribution, a proportional and honestly-scoped experimental evaluation that does not pretend to be the contribution.DataNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- iros-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing IROS experiments — real-robot trial counts, success criteria set in advance, reset procedures, failure taxonomies, baseline fairness on matched hardware, sim-to-real gap reporting, small-n statistics, and the claim-to-evidence ladder that embodied-systems reviewers apply before they trust a demo.OtherNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- podc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when building the evidence for an ACM PODC paper — where "evidence" is a proof, not a benchmark. Covers matching upper and lower bounds, tightness arguments, model and assumption stress-tests, adversary-strength calibration, and the honest, clearly-optional role of any simulation in a distributed-computing-theory paper.TestingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- icml-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when stress-testing ICML experimental evidence before submission or rebuttal, including strong tuned baselines, mechanism-isolating ablations, seed variance and confidence intervals, compute disclosure, data leakage and split construction, reproducibility, negative results, and fit to ICML soundness, originality, and significance scoring.TestingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- dac-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs inside the six reviewed pages of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript versus in an external repository, given DAC's tight 6+1 budget, its references-only seventh page, the double-blind constraint on any linked material, and the absence of a formal reviewed-appendix or artifact-badging track.DesignNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- code-quality-analyzeralibaba/skill-upTriggered when the user submits code or requests a comprehensive code quality analysis. Automatically performs static analysis, code review, and quality scoring. Analysis covers coding standards, potential bugs, performance issues, and security vulnerabilities. Trigger phrases include "analyze code quality", "comprehensive check", "code score".EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- add-mnemonnanocoai/nanoclawAdd persistent graph-based memory via mnemon. Agents recall past context before responding and remember insights after each turn.ProductivityNo warnings★ 31.1K↓ —
- uai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when converting an accepted UAI paper into its PMLR proceedings version, covering de-anonymization, final formatting against the UAI template, metadata for the PMLR volume, restoring public code and data links, poster and spotlight preparation for the conference, and sequencing work back from the camera-ready deadline.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- atc-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in the ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) two-page extended abstract, the 12-page paper body, the optional appendix, and the artifact — splitting content by review round and decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives where a reviewer is not required to read.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vis-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted IEEE VIS paper for its IEEE TVCG camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the VGTC/TVCG template and journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, IEEE keywords/index terms), integrating the second-round required changes without scope creep, permanentizing open-materials links, the Open Practices disclosure form, and the Graphics Replicability Stamp handoff.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- wsdm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- podc-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ACM PODC submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-step abstract-registration then full-paper deadline, the ACM Master template with the 10-page-merits budget and unbounded full version, lightweight double-blind anonymization, the regular-paper-vs-Brief-Announcement choice, and desk-risk triage before the AoE cutoff.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- sosp-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a SOSP submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the abstract-registration and full-paper deadlines, the 12-page technical-content limit with references excluded, the 7x9-inch two-column format, double-blind rules with paper-ID substitution, conflict declaration under PC-chair audit, and desk-reject triage.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- sci-abstractbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing the two front-matter artifacts Science (AAAS) demands — the one-sentence summary for the table of contents and the ≤125-word single-paragraph abstract — both readable by any scientist and both leading with the quantified advance rather than the method. Late-stage polish skill for the flagship AAAS weekly.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- ndss-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when performing the final pre-upload audit of an NDSS submission — HotCRP fields, the AoE deadline, NDSS template and 13-page compliance, double-blind sweep, ethics readiness, the six-per-author cap, overlap rules, and desk-reject triage in the last week.LegalNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- kdd-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted KDD paper for ACM proceedings, covering the 12-page proceedings budget with 9 content pages, the extra content page over the submission, the 3-page cap on references plus appendix, ACM e-rights and TAPS source processing, ACM Open APC status, de-anonymization, and Digital Library metadata for SIGKDD.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- fse-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an ESEC/FSE submission against the software-engineering literature across ICSE, FSE, ASE, ISSTA, MSR, and the SE journals (EMSE, TSE, TOSEM), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-anonymous, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- icdm-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) submission for readiness, covering Research-vs-Applied track choice and its anonymity regime, the triple-blind sweep, the 10-page IEEE all-inclusive cap, the single June deadline, in-paper artifact references, and the desk-level triggers that get an ICDM paper rejected without review.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- atc-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — covering the systems literature lanes, positioning against OSDI/SOSP/NSDI/EuroSys/FAST, writing delta-first comparisons, and keeping self-citation double-blind.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cvpr-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a CVPR submission before the OpenReview deadline, covering abstract registration and profile requirements, the 8-page limit including figures and tables, the Compute Reporting Form, anonymity and external-link bans, dual-submission attestations, reviewer-duty enrollment, and desk-reject triage.PlanningNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cav-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for its Springer LNCS open-access camera-ready, covering de-anonymization for the previously double-blind categories, the LNCS llncs template and Springer metadata (ORCID, author order, running heads), the copyright/open-access forms, integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep, permanentizing artifact links, and the AEC badge handoff.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- imc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM IMC measurements, covering representative vantage points, honest ground truth, longitudinal design for a moving Internet, safe and ethical active measurement, coverage-bias quantification, provenance pinning, and matching the measurement to the shape of each claim about the real Internet.DesignNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- atc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — matching evidence to the claim with real testbeds, fair baselines, end-to-end plus microbenchmark results, tail-latency and variance reporting, workload realism, and honest cost accounting.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- acl-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode logistics.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
review
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
EngineeringUpdated 9 hours ago
From the author
The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.
Install
npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
What it can touch
Instructions onlyNo network use seenLicence: APACHE-2.0
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
Security100
Provenance78
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption51
Files (1)
- SKILL.md