Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
49,409 skills from 2,375 repositories · updated 12 hours ago
48,362 skills
- stoc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether computation belongs in a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper at all — STOC accepts on theorems, with no empirical-evaluation expectation — and when it does, scoping it as certified proof computation, constructive search, or clearly labeled illustration rather than benchmarking.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- socc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM SoCC evaluations, covering real or realistic deployments over simulation, production or representative workloads and traces, tail-latency and cost as first-class metrics, fair tuned baselines, scale and multi-tenancy behavior, reproducible measurement pipelines, and matching evidence to the shape of each cloud claim.DevOpsNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- sosp-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SOSP paper — mapping every claim to an experiment, choosing baselines a systems PC will accept as fair, mixing microbenchmarks with end-to-end and failure runs, reporting tails and overheads honestly, and isolating the mechanism the design credits.DesignNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- aaai-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- asplos-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ASPLOS campaign across the two-deadline cycle — sequencing evidence building, the September 9, 2026 submission gate, author-response windows, the December 21 notification, Major Revision resubmission six weeks later, artifact evaluation, and the April 2027 conference in Crete, with owners per risk.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cell-star-methodsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the three Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the exact required order.OtherNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- openspec-apply-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowImplement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- code-quality-revieweralibaba/skill-upReviews code and provides detailed quality assessmentEngineeringNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- openspec-exploreMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowEnter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.FinanceNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- openspec-archive-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowArchive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- openspec-apply-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowImplement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- openspec-update-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowUpdate an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.WritingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- openspec-update-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowUpdate an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.WritingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- openspec-update-changeMemeMeow-Studio/MemeMeowUpdate an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.WritingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
pip-responder
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
WritingUpdated 22 hours ago
From the author
Respond to a performance improvement plan strategically — decode what the PIP really is, decide fight-vs-land-softly with clear eyes, build the evidence file, and run the parallel job search the situation demands. Use when asked I was just put on a PIP what do I do, help me respond to a performance improvement plan, is my PIP survivable, or write my PIP check-in updates. Produces the honest read of the PIP, the two-track plan (perform + search), the documentation system, and templates for check-ins and the written response.
Install
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill pip-responder -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/pip-responder/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
What it can touch
Instructions onlyNo network use seenLicence: MIT
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
Security100
Provenance78
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption51
Files (1)
- SKILL.md