Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
49,409 skills from 2,375 repositories · updated 7 hours ago
48,362 skills
- socc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM SoCC evaluations, covering real or realistic deployments over simulation, production or representative workloads and traces, tail-latency and cost as first-class metrics, fair tuned baselines, scale and multi-tenancy behavior, reproducible measurement pipelines, and matching evidence to the shape of each cloud claim.DevOpsNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- stoc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether computation belongs in a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper at all — STOC accepts on theorems, with no empirical-evaluation expectation — and when it does, scoping it as certified proof computation, constructive search, or clearly labeled illustration rather than benchmarking.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- pods-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the analytical "evidence" of an ACM PODS paper — worst-case and average-case analyses, matching upper and lower bounds, dichotomy completeness, correct complexity assumptions, and the occasional empirical validation when a theory paper claims practicality — matching the rigor to the shape of each theoretical claim.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- kdd-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a KDD project calendar across the venue's two submission cycles per year, including cycle choice, abstract-then-paper deadline pairs a week apart, rebuttal capacity planning, the Resubmit-to-next-cycle loop, ADS evidence lead times, and ACM e-rights/TAPS camera-ready scheduling for SIGKDD.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cikm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical program of a CIKM paper — matching evidence to the claim's lanes across retrieval, mining, and knowledge-management evaluation cultures, choosing datasets and baselines that survive a blended panel, isolating the boundary mechanism, and meeting applied-track deployment-evidence bars.DevOpsNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- colt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs numerical content at all — COLT has no experiments requirement — and, when numerics genuinely help, designing small illustrative simulations that visualize a proved bound, a separation, or a phase transition without diluting the theory.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- chi-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- nejm-abstractbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to write the NEJM structured abstract — four headed sections (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions), ≤250 words, with the trial registration number and funding source, leading the Results with the primary outcome reported as an effect size with a 95% CI. Late-stage polish skill.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- ase-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when shaping the prose and structure of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research paper, covering the automation-first first-page arc, stating the automated task precisely, keeping the tool runnable and the model-swap test in mind, threats-as-argument, and the 10+2 page discipline on the ACM acmart template.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- acl-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when organizing appendices and supplementary material for an ACL paper under ACL Rolling Review, covering the mandatory Limitations and optional ethics sections, appendices after references, anonymized software and data archives, the no-cloud-links rule, and deciding what must stay in the 8-page or 4-page body.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- ase-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- acmmm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the end-to-end ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) campaign calendar — from thematic-area scoping and track choice, through the April OpenReview abstract/paper/supplement chain, the June anonymous rebuttal, the July decision, the August camera-ready, and the November presentation in Rio, with the right skill invoked at each stage.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- atc-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- wacv-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a WACV submission before an OpenReview round deadline, covering the Round 1 vs Round 2 choice, the Applications vs Algorithms track field, the 8-page-including-figures limit, double-blind anonymity and OpenReview-profile requirements, the anonymized supplement, dual submission, and desk-reject triage.PlanningNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- uai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a UAI submission within the probabilistic reasoning, graphical-model, causality, and Bayesian ML literature, covering PMLR archival status of recent UAI volumes, double-blind self-citation discipline, concurrent arXiv and workshop versions, and the cross-community citation coverage UAI reviewers check first.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- aaai-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.OtherNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vldb-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a PVLDB submission before a monthly deadline, covering the mandatory abstract on the 25th, the CMT window, the 1st-of-month 5:00 PM Pacific cutoff, category and page-budget choice, single-blind cover-page requirements, the per-month and per-year author caps, and desk-reject hazards specific to VLDB.PlanningNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- app-ui-mockupsNewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsTen animated UI mockups for product, launch and dev-tool videos, rebuilt as HTML instead of screen recordings: phone message thread, team chat channel, coding-agent terminal session, terminal command run, desktop terminal window, desktop notification banner, code editor walkthrough, 3D code slab, exploded UI panels and an amber CRT console. Presets give typing speed (12-20 characters per second with seeded gaps), reading holds from character count, entrance easing and scale, camera lead before each action, text size as a share of frame height, and theme colors from MIT theme sources, from Charm VHS, Screen Studio, Emil Kowalski, Apple HIG and Netflix timing rules. Use when someone wants a fake text or Slack conversation, a terminal or Claude Code demo, a code walkthrough or an exploded UI shot in a video. NOT for recording a real screen or for real people's messages presented as genuine.DesignNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —
- stoc-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) submission for HotCRP readiness — the abstract + table-of-contents + first-12-pages reading rule, single-column 11-point format, double-blind hygiene, the SIGACT prior/simultaneous-publication policy, and deadline-week sequencing before the November cutoff.OtherNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- sigir-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a SIGIR project calendar — backward-planning from the January-pattern abstract/paper deadlines to the July conference, sequencing evidence freeze, significance testing, and anonymization, coordinating multi-track decisions, and wiring the SIGIR/ECIR/CIKM/WSDM/SIGIR-AP fallback calendar into one pipeline.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- tacas-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a TACAS (ETAPS) project timeline from category choice and venue fit through the EasyChair paper deadline, the mandatory tool-paper artifact deadline, the rebuttal window, notification, the voluntary post-acceptance artifact round, LNCS camera-ready, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets that account for TACAS's single annual round and its parallel paper+artifact review.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- sci-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding which sci-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for Science (AAAS). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- socc-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ACM SoCC (Symposium on Cloud Computing) research-paper submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-round abstract+paper deadlines, the acmart/sigconf 12-page (full) or 6-page (short) budget with unlimited references, dual-anonymous review, the systems-and-data reproducibility posture, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
plan-campaign-budget-and-tests
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
TestingUpdated Oct 27, 2026
From the author
Step of the plan-campaign playbook: splits the budget across chosen channels, checks per-channel minimums, and writes the test plan and paid structure. Run plan-campaign instead; not for direct use.
Install
npx skills add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill plan-campaign-budget-and-tests -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/plan-campaign-budget-and-tests/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
What it can touch
Instructions onlyNo network use seenLicence: MIT
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
Security100
Provenance77
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption50
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- skill.meta.json