Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
49,105 skills from 2,358 repositories · updated 9 hours ago
48,055 skills
- reflectNewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsMine this session's transcript for lessons that will still hold in six months and turn each into an edit to a skill the session used, applied only after the user approves. Use at the end of a session, or on "reflect", "what should we learn from this", "capture lessons".WritingNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —
- masonrykostja94/marketing-skillsDeprecated compatibility entry for Masonry construction. This component is now maintained in Bricks; install and use component-builder to build a new Masonry.OtherNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- cav-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- orchestratehashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsCoordinate several workers: what idle agents do next, which finished work gets checked first, how to recover a dead one. Use when: managing multiple agents.OtherNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —Also in 2 other repos
- colt-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding whether a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs numerical content at all — COLT has no experiments requirement — and, when numerics genuinely help, designing small illustrative simulations that visualize a proved bound, a separation, or a phase transition without diluting the theory.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- chi-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- colm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical core of a COLM paper — contamination analysis for evaluation data, fair baselines under matched prompting and compute, pinned model versions and decoding parameters, uncertainty over runs and samples, scaling coverage, and honest reporting of API-model comparisons.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- slack-a2a-roomsnanocoai/nanoclawAgent-to-agent Slack rooms — a group DM (MPIM) holding a human plus two or more NanoClaw sibling bots, where each bot hears the room over its own Socket Mode connection. Registers the admission policy on the Slack channel's bot-inbound guard so bot-authored inbound is admitted only for rooms allowlisted in SLACK_A2A_ROOMS (re-attributed as slack:bot:<botId>, hop-limited via SLACK_A2A_MAX_HOPS), plus scripts/open-a2a-room.ts to open a room and register it.OtherNo warnings★ 31.1K↓ —
- runhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsRun a full pipeline for a task. Orchestrates roles through stages (standalone or HOTL-integrated).ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —
- acl-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an ACL paper for computational-linguistics house style, covering task-first framing, linguistic examples tied to quantitative error analysis, scoping language claims to tested languages, LLM-era claim discipline, anonymous self-reference, Limitations prose, and compressing into the 8-page or 4-page ACL format.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- add-dashboardnanocoai/nanoclawAdd a monitoring dashboard to NanoClaw. Installs @nanoco/nanoclaw-dashboard and a pusher that sends periodic JSON snapshots.OtherNo warnings★ 31.1K↓ —
- ase-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- acmmm-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning the end-to-end ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) campaign calendar — from thematic-area scoping and track choice, through the April OpenReview abstract/paper/supplement chain, the June anonymous rebuttal, the July decision, the August camera-ready, and the November presentation in Rio, with the right skill invoked at each stage.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- atc-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- os-ask-simplekharmanskyi/open-stepsALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- inbox-triagenano-muse/nanoMuseGo through recent mail and sort it into needs-a-reply, waiting-on-others, to-do and can-ignore, with draft replies ready for review. Use when the user asks to triage, sort, catch up on or clear their inbox; never to send anything on its own.EngineeringNo warnings★ 3K↓ —
- wacv-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a WACV submission before an OpenReview round deadline, covering the Round 1 vs Round 2 choice, the Applications vs Algorithms track field, the 8-page-including-figures limit, double-blind anonymity and OpenReview-profile requirements, the anonymized supplement, dual submission, and desk-reject triage.PlanningNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vis-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an IEEE VIS submission against the visualization literature across TVCG, the six VIS areas, EuroVis/CGF, PacificVis, and adjacent HCI/graphics venues, writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-blind when opted in, and handling concurrent, preprint, and prior-version overlap for a TVCG journal article.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- uist-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when performing the final pre-upload audit of a UIST paper in PCS — the abstract-then-paper deadline pair, 10-page/5-page two-column limits with desk-reject enforcement, anonymous acmart options, video-figure and supplementary uploads, the prior-work overlap rule, and deadline-week sequencing.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vldb-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing a PVLDB submission before a monthly deadline, covering the mandatory abstract on the 25th, the CMT window, the 1st-of-month 5:00 PM Pacific cutoff, category and page-budget choice, single-blind cover-page requirements, the per-month and per-year author caps, and desk-reject hazards specific to VLDB.PlanningNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- sigir-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a SIGIR project calendar — backward-planning from the January-pattern abstract/paper deadlines to the July conference, sequencing evidence freeze, significance testing, and anonymization, coordinating multi-track decisions, and wiring the SIGIR/ECIR/CIKM/WSDM/SIGIR-AP fallback calendar into one pipeline.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- tacas-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning a TACAS (ETAPS) project timeline from category choice and venue fit through the EasyChair paper deadline, the mandatory tool-paper artifact deadline, the rebuttal window, notification, the voluntary post-acceptance artifact round, LNCS camera-ready, and presentation, with backward-planning offsets that account for TACAS's single annual round and its parallel paper+artifact review.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- soda-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing or auditing a SODA (ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms) submission — the no-page-limit full-version norm, the title-page abstract, 11-point single-column letter format, lightweight double-blind rules, HotCRP entry, and the July AoE deadline with its summary-rejection triggers.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- socc-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an ACM SoCC (Symposium on Cloud Computing) research-paper submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-round abstract+paper deadlines, the acmart/sigconf 12-page (full) or 6-page (short) budget with unlimited references, dual-anonymous review, the systems-and-data reproducibility posture, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
brooks-debt
hyhmrright/brooks-lint
DevOpsUpdated 17 hours ago
From the author
Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.
Install
npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint --skill brooks-debt -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/brooks-debt/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
What it can touch
Instructions onlyNo network use seenLicence: MIT
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
Security100
Provenance78
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption51
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- debt-guide.md