Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
49,418 skills from 2,407 repositories · updated 9 minutes ago
49,416 skills
- product-researchalirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse when planning or synthesizing user research: choosing the method, deciding how many participants, or turning coded notes into insights. Runs study_designer.py, saturation_planner.py and insight_synthesizer.py, which refuses single-source insights.ScienceNo warnings★ 29.3K↓ —
- metric-designagentscope-ai/OpenJudgeUse when the user has evaluation principles or a dataset but needs help choosing the right graders, designing evaluation metrics, creating LLM-as-judge prompts, combining multiple metrics into a composite score, or building an automated evaluation pipeline. Also use when the user mentions grader selection, metric design, judge prompt engineering, rubric design, evaluation pipeline code, or "how to evaluate [X] automatically." Outputs executable OpenJudge pipeline code.DesignNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- facct-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when planning an ACM FAccT project timeline from venue fit through abstract registration, OpenReview submission, the rebuttal window, the new Accept/Revise/Reject revise-and-resubmit round, two-round camera-ready, and in-person presentation, with backward-planning offsets for an interdisciplinary responsible-AI paper and honest handling of the single annual deadline.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cwd-rolluphoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorRoll up Claude Code sessions by working directory (project) from Agent Monitor data — session count, total cost, total tokens, and last-active timestamp per cwd — so per-project activity can be compared at a glance. Use when summarizing where effort and spend went across projects.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- data-formshuytieu/COG-second-brainPick the right way to represent a dataset so a reader gets the finding in three seconds — a catalog of 20+ chart and diagram forms with when-to-use and failure modes, plus the encoding decisions that make any of them readable (takeaway headline, direct labels, kill the axis, highlight-and-mute, show the caveat). Style-agnostic — use with whatever palette or design system the destination already has. Use when charting survey results, benchmark data, usage metrics, or research findings for a post, brief, deck, or report, and whenever the default bar chart feels like it's burying the point.DocumentsNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- oma-architectureUpdatedfirst-fluke/oh-my-agentEvaluate system boundaries and architectural tradeoffs. Use for architecture decisions, design reviews, and ADRs.PlanningNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —Also in 4 other repos
- add-codexnanocoai/nanoclawUse Codex (OpenAI's codex app-server) as a full agent provider — planning, tool orchestration, MCP tools, server-side history, session resume — alongside or instead of Claude. ChatGPT subscription or OpenAI API key, vault-only via the selected gateway. Per-group via `ncl groups config update --provider codex`. Distinct from using OpenAI as an MCP tool (where Claude remains the planner).PlanningNo warnings★ 31.1K↓ —
- ab-test-setupalirezarezvani/claude-skillsUse before planning or launching any A/B, split or multivariate test, or when asked if a result is significant. Sizes the test with sample_size_calculator.py and writes the hypothesis, metric and stop rule first, so it is not called early on noise.TestingNo warnings★ 29.3K↓ —
- cav-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) empirical evaluation, covering standard benchmark sets (SV-COMP/SMT-COMP/HWMCC/VNN-COMP), fair baseline solvers with pinned versions and equal resource limits, timeout-dominated comparisons, soundness cross-checks and proof witnesses, cactus/scatter reporting, and matching evidence to the shape of each verification claim.OtherNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- jama-scope-fitbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether a clinical study clears JAMA's general-medical-importance bar before investing in a full submission. Assesses fit and article-type match; it does NOT design the study or write the paper.DesignNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- aaai-submissionbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.LegalNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- sci-writingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when choosing the Science (AAAS) format (Research Article vs Report) and holding its length and structure budgets — main-text word caps, figure caps, argument-ordered Results, and deciding what belongs in the main text versus Supplementary Materials.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- nejm-reportingbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to select and enforce the correct EQUATOR reporting guideline for a clinical study headed to NEJM — CONSORT for RCTs (with the participant flow diagram), STROBE for observational, PRISMA for systematic reviews — and to build the required checklist and diagram before submission.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- chi-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when preparing an accepted ACM CHI paper for publication — the TAPS source upload, the PCS publication-ready package, mandatory accessibility work (alt text, screen-reader-friendly PDFs, table headers), video previews, ACM's open-access model, e-rights, and registration deadlines.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- parallelhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsBuild a planned game with several agents at once — game logic and netcode, levels, art, sound, the landing page — each in its own folders, then one merge, a two-browser check, a playtest and a blind review. Use only when parallel work is requested and the host supports it. Use after the plan step, or when someone asks to "build it in parallel", "use more agents", "split the work" or "go faster".DesignNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- cav-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission against the verification literature across CAV, TACAS, FMCAD, VMCAI, POPL/PLDI, and the journals (FMSD, JAR, TOCL, STTT), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, crediting the right benchmark and tool lineages, keeping self-citations double-anonymous for the anonymized categories, and handling concurrent and prior-version overlap.WritingNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- pldi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
- rss-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsJournal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。PlanningNo warnings★ 1.4K↓ —
compare-options
nano-muse/nanoMuse
PlanningUpdated 19 hours ago
From the author
Compare two to five options (products, plans, places, tools, offers) on the criteria that matter to the user, in a table the user can re-weight, with a recommendation. Use when the user asks which to pick, for a comparison, or "X vs Y".
Install
npx skills add nano-muse/nanoMuse --skill compare-options -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/compare-options/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (GPL-3.0) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
What it can touch
Instructions onlyNo network use seenLicence: GPL-3.0
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
Security100
Provenance82
Maintenance100
Licence80
Adoption56
Files (1)
- SKILL.md