Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
49,492 skills from 2,391 repositories · updated 8 hours ago
49,492 skills
- review-paperpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowA ready-to-fork Claude Code template for academics using LaTeX/Beamer + R. Multi-agent review, quality gates, adversarial QA, and replication protocols.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- extract-tikzpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowExtract TikZ diagrams from Beamer `.tex` source, compile each to a standalone PDF, and convert to SVG with 0-based indexing. Use when user says "extract the tikz", "regenerate the diagrams", "rebuild the SVGs", "sync tikz to quarto", or after editing TikZ blocks in a Beamer deck that also has a Quarto mirror.DocumentsNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- validate-bibpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowValidate bibliography entries against citations in all lecture files. Structural checks (missing/unused entries, malformed fields) by default; `--semantic` adds citation-drift detection, DOI verification, and style-consistency checks.OtherNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- cellprofilerK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsRuns reproducible CellProfiler microscopy pipelines for nuclear segmentation, cell counts, and per-object fluorescence measurements. Supports image/channel manifests, headless batch execution, segmentation overlays, and measurement QC for 2D fluorescence assays.MediaNo warnings★ 56.1K↓ —
- new-diagrampedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowScaffold a new TikZ diagram from the snippet gallery with prevention rules pre-applied (explicit node dimensions, coordinate map, directional edge labels). Compiles standalone, invokes tikz-reviewer with citations from tikz-measurement.md, and loops on revisions until APPROVED.OtherNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- review-rpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowRead-only R code review protocol for `.R` scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, tidyverse idioms, and professional standards; produces a report without editing. Use when user says "review this R script", "check the R code", "audit the analysis code", "code review on the R", or when an R file is touched as part of a paper submission. NOT for running the code — pair with `/audit-reproducibility` for numeric verification.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- diagnosepedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowA ready-to-fork Claude Code template for academics using LaTeX/Beamer + R. Multi-agent review, quality gates, adversarial QA, and replication protocols.TestingNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- hivemind-memoryactiveloopai/hivemindGlobal team and org memory powered by Activeloop. ALWAYS check BOTH built-in memory AND Hivemind memory when recalling information.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.6K↓ —
- commitpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowCommit the current work — runs the quality, consistency and passport gates, branches off main if needed, stages specific files, and writes a commit whose subject states what is now true. Pushes and opens a pull request only with --pr or when the user asks; never merges — a merge happens only when the user explicitly says to merge. Use ONLY on explicit commit intent — user says "commit", "let's commit this", "open a PR", or prefixes with `/commit`. Do NOT auto-invoke on vague end-of-task phrases ("we're done", "wrap up") — those require explicit confirmation first. Never force-pushes or skips hooks.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- issuespedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowKeeps a project's to-do list and memory in GitHub issues — files each finding (from a review, an audit, or the user) as its own issue without duplicates, lists the open issues that bear on the current work, and closes an issue with a comment recording what was wrong, what was tried, what worked, and how it was fixed. Use when review findings or a list of problems should become tracked work (a paper's misleading claims, a codebase's bugs, improvements for later), when starting or resuming work and deciding what to do next, or when a fix has landed and its issue should be closed with a record. Needs the GitHub CLI; warns before posting to a public repository.ScienceNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- gmailLeoYeAI/agent-master-skillsGmail API integration with managed OAuth. Read, send, and manage emails, threads, labels, and drafts. Use this skill when users want to interact with Gmail. For other third party apps, use the api-gateway skill (https://clawhub.ai/byungkyu/api-gateway).EngineeringNo warnings★ 2.2K↓ —
- juristen-paulusKlotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtFür Juristen Paulus: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.OtherNo warnings★ 1.8K↓ —
- experimental-designK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsDesigns experiments and studies BEFORE data is collected — choosing a design, randomizing, blocking, and laying out treatment combinations so results are interpretable. Use whenever someone is planning a study, asks how to assign subjects/samples to groups, mentions randomization, blocking, stratification, controls, factorial or fractional-factorial designs, design of experiments (DOE), screening many factors, response-surface optimization, crossover or repeated-measures or split-plot designs, cluster/group randomization, Latin squares, plate layouts, batch/run-order effects, replication vs. pseudoreplication, or sequential/adaptive/group-sequential designs. Trigger even for informal phrasings like "how should I set up this experiment", "how do I avoid confounding", "what's the best way to test these 6 factors", or "assign these mice to conditions". For computing the sample size or power once the design is chosen, use statistical-power; for analyzing data already collected, use statistical-analysis.DesignNo warnings★ 56.1K↓ —
- completion-verificationcbrock84/headcountVerifies that work is actually complete before it is claimed to be — running the checks, reading the output, and confirming the original request was satisfied rather than approximated. Use this before saying something is done, fixed, or passing; before committing or opening a pull request; and whenever a claim of success has not been backed by command output.EngineeringNo warnings★ 2.6K↓ —
- launch-pruefungKlotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtFür Produkt-Launch-Freigabeprüfung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Tatbestands- oder Anspruchsmatrix.OtherNo warnings★ 1.8K↓ —
- mom-testwondelai/skillsTalk to customers without leading them using Mom Test rules: discuss their life not your idea, ask about specifics in the past, and talk less. Use when the user mentions "customer interviews", "validate my idea", "users say they want it but dont buy", "leading questions", "The Mom Test", "customer feedback bias", or "interview script". Also trigger when preparing user-research questions, interpreting ambiguous feedback, or designing customer-discovery that avoids false positives. Covers commitment and advancement, avoiding compliments, and extracting signal from noise. For product-market fit, see jobs-to-be-done. For rapid prototype testing, see design-sprint.TestingNo warnings★ 2.6K↓ —Also in 2 other repos
- anspruchstabelleKlotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtFür Anspruchstabelle im Zivilprozess: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Tatbestands- oder Anspruchsmatrix.OtherNo warnings★ 1.8K↓ —
- hivemind-memoryactiveloopai/hivemindGlobal team and org memory powered by Activeloop. ALWAYS check BOTH built-in memory AND Hivemind memory when recalling information.ProductivityNo warnings★ 1.6K↓ —
- procurement-and-sourcingcbrock84/headcountBuys well — specifying need, running competitive sourcing, negotiating, and category strategy before a contract exists. Use this to run an RFP or vendor selection, negotiate a purchase, consolidate spend across a category, decide between single and multiple suppliers, or bring uncontrolled spending under management.LegalNo warnings★ 2.6K↓ —
- dev-reviewcodeaholicguy/ai-devkitAI DevKit · Final code review phase guidance for holistic pre-push review. Use when the user wants code review, final lifecycle review, design alignment checks, integration risk review, or dev-lifecycle phase 9.EngineeringNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- brainstormcodeaholicguy/ai-devkitAI DevKit · Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, generate ideas, expand options, challenge ideas, pressure-test ideas, compare concepts, narrow choices, name something, plan content angles, explore strategy, evaluate product ideas, technical approaches, experiments, or decisions.PlanningNo warnings★ 1.7K↓ —
- crossing-the-chasmwondelai/skillsNavigate the technology adoption lifecycle from early adopters to mainstream market. Use when the user mentions "crossing the chasm", "beachhead segment", "whole product", "early adopters vs mainstream", "tech go-to-market", "bowling pin strategy", "technology adoption lifecycle", "pragmatist buyers", "growth stalled after early adopters", or "our go-to-market plan". Also trigger when planning go-to-market for a technical product. Covers the D-Day analogy, bowling-pin strategy, the tornado, and positioning against incumbents. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For new market creation, see blue-ocean-strategy.MarketingNo warnings★ 2.6K↓ —Also in 2 other repos
- nature-sharedYuan1z0825/nature-skillsInternal shared-reference support package for installed Nature Skills, including nature-writing, nature-polishing, nature-response, nature-reader, and nature-paper2ppt. Do not invoke it as a standalone user workflow. Load only the specific core or journal-format file requested by another Nature skill.WritingNo warnings★ 52.2K↓ —
- preisangabenKlotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtFür Preisangaben (PAngV 2022): ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.OtherNo warnings★ 1.8K↓ —
review-a-design
inkeep/open-knowledge
DesignUpdated 14 hours ago
From the author
Reviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).
Install
npx skills add inkeep/open-knowledge --skill review-a-design -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/review-a-design/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (GPL-3.0) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
What it can touch
Instructions onlyNo network use seenLicence: GPL-3.0
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 89
Security100
Provenance84
Maintenance100
Licence80
Adoption58
Files (1)
- SKILL.md