Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
45,100 skills from 2,196 repositories · updated 12 hours ago
44,137 skills
- offensive-cicd-secretsSnailSploit/Claude-RedComprehensive secrets extraction methodology targeting CI/CD environments across all major platforms. Covers environment variable extraction from build contexts, exploitation of vault and secrets-manager misconfigurations (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager), runner and agent token abuse for lateral movement, OIDC federation attacks exploiting trust relationships between CI/CD providers and cloud platforms, build log leakage analysis for inadvertently exposed credentials, cache poisoning techniques for credential exfiltration, platform-specific credential store exploitation (GitHub Actions secrets, GitLab CI variables, Jenkins credential providers), service connection and service account abuse in Azure DevOps and GCP, and Docker registry credential theft from build environments. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1552 (Unsecured Credentials) and its sub-techniques. Each section provides enumeration procedures, extraction techniques, and post-exploitation pivoting guidance for using rDevOpsNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- offensive-evil-twinSnailSploit/Claude-RedEvil Twin / KARMA / Mana access point methodology — rogue AP construction with hostapd-mana / wifiphisher / airgeddon, KARMA universal probe response, Mana selective probe response, captive portal phishing, deauth-driven client coercion to attacker AP, MAC randomization defeat via PNL leak analysis, post-association MITM (DNS, ARP, transparent proxy), credential capture for portal/web/SMB, and detection-evasion tactics. Use to coerce client devices onto an attacker-controlled AP, intercept their traffic, harvest credentials, or deliver payloads via captive portal.OtherNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- offensive-fuzzingSnailSploit/Claude-RedPractical offensive fuzzing methodology covering target identification, fuzzer selection (AFL++, libFuzzer, Honggfuzz, Boofuzz, syzkaller), harness writing, corpus curation, mutation strategies, coverage measurement, and crash triage. Use when setting up or running fuzz campaigns against any target: file parsers, network protocols, kernel drivers, EDR engines, embedded firmware, or language runtimes.WritingNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- offensive-wifiSnailSploit/Claude-RedWireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons / Mana evil twin attacks, captive-portal phishing, KRACK and FragAttacks, WPS Pixie Dust, deauthentication and disassociation attacks, rogue AP construction (hostapd-mana), 802.1X bypass, MAC randomization defeat, BLE/Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 sidebands, and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 considerations. Use when scoping wireless pentest, war-driving an estate, or testing corporate wireless segmentation.SecurityNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- offensive-wpsSnailSploit/Claude-RedWPS (Wi-Fi Protected Setup) PIN attack methodology — Pixie Dust offline attack against vulnerable chipsets (Ralink, Realtek, Broadcom, MediaTek), online PIN brute-force with reaver/bully, lockout handling, time-of-day evasion, WPS push-button vulnerability windows, and PIN-to-PSK derivation. Use when a target SOHO router exposes WPS — common on consumer ISP gear, often left enabled by default even when WPS attacks have been known for over a decade.SecurityNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- offensive-cloudSnailSploit/Claude-RedCloud security attack methodology covering AWS, Azure, and GCP. Includes credential harvesting (IMDS, ~/.aws, env vars, leaked CI secrets, instance roles), enumeration with cloud-specific tools (pacu, ScoutSuite, Prowler, ROADtools, gcp_enum), privilege escalation paths (IAM PassRole, AssumeRole chains, Lambda/Functions privilege flips, Azure Owner-on-self, GCP serviceAccountTokenCreator), persistence techniques (IAM user/key creation, AAD app registration, GCP svc account key creation, EventBridge/Logic Apps backdoors), data exfiltration (S3/Blob/GCS, snapshot share, RDS/CosmosDB/Cloud SQL exfil), cloud-native lateral movement (cross-account assume, Azure AD multi-tenant, GCP project hierarchy), serverless attacks (Lambda env vars, layer hijack, Step Functions), Kubernetes-on-cloud (EKS/AKS/GKE-specific paths to node and AWS metadata), and CSPM evasion (CloudTrail blind spots, GuardDuty mute, Sentinel rule shaping). Use when the engagement scope is cloud accounts, when you've stolen cloud credentials, or wheSecurityNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- offensive-sstiSnailSploit/Claude-RedDense description covering Server-Side Template Injection across Jinja2, Twig, Freemarker, Velocity, Pebble, Smarty, Mako, Handlebars, ERB, Thymeleaf, EJS, Pug. Engine fingerprinting, filter bypass, blind exploitation, WAF evasion, SSTI-to-RCE chains. Tools: tplmap. CWE-1336. MITRE T1190. Use when testing template rendering endpoints or exploiting template injection for code execution.TestingNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- vulnerability-triage-brocardstrailofbits/skillsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.SecurityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- semgrep-rule-variant-creatortrailofbits/skillsCreates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.TestingNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- offensive-iotSnailSploit/Claude-RedIoT and embedded device security testing methodology. Covers hardware reconnaissance (UART, JTAG, SWD, SPI flash, I2C EEPROM, eMMC chip-off), firmware acquisition (vendor portals, OTA capture, flash dump, binwalk extraction), firmware analysis (filesystem mounting, binary triage, hardcoded secrets, default credential discovery), bootloader attacks (U-Boot console, secure-boot bypass, fault injection), runtime attacks on embedded Linux/RTOS (busybox CVEs, MTD writes, /dev/mem), wireless protocol attacks (Zigbee, BLE, Z-Wave, LoRaWAN, Thread/Matter, sub-GHz), MQTT/CoAP/Modbus/BACnet/OPC-UA exploitation, mobile companion app analysis, cloud-IoT API abuse, and side-channel/glitching basics. Use for IoT pentest, smart-home assessment, ICS/OT testing, or embedded vulnerability research.SecurityNo warnings★ 9.3K↓ —
- cairo-vulnerability-scannertrailofbits/skillsScans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects.SecurityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- ton-vulnerability-scannertrailofbits/skillsScans TON (The Open Network) smart contracts for 3 critical vulnerabilities including integer-as-boolean misuse, fake Jetton contracts, and forward TON without gas checks. Use when auditing FunC contracts.SecurityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- spec-to-code-compliancetrailofbits/skillsCheck code against the documentation that specifies it - which requirements hold, which the code contradicts, which are absent, and what the code does that no document mentions. Use when comparing an implementation against a whitepaper, protocol spec, or design document.LegalNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- secure-workflow-guidetrailofbits/skillsGuides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas. Use when securing a smart contract end to end rather than hunting one bug, checking a project on every check-in or before deployment, triaging a Slither report, or asking where to start on smart contract security.ProductivityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- agentic-actions-auditortrailofbits/skillsAudits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.SecurityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- property-based-testingtrailofbits/skillsWrites, reviews, and debugs property-based tests — Hypothesis, fast-check, proptest, jqwik, rapid, and Echidna or Medusa for Solidity invariants. Use whenever tests should cover a whole input domain instead of a hand-picked list of examples: encode/decode and serialize/deserialize pairs, parsers, canonicalizers and normalizers, validators, numeric and Decimal types, comparators and sort order, data structures, and smart-contract state invariants. Also use when adding cases to an existing @given, fast-check, or proptest suite, when judging whether existing property tests assert anything real, and when a generator has shrunk a counterexample and you need to tell a wrong property from a genuine bug. Not for coverage-guided binary fuzzing (libFuzzer, AFL), mutation-testing campaigns, static analysis, benchmarking, or end-to-end UI tests.TestingNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- fuzzing-dictionarytrailofbits/skillsBuilds and applies fuzzing dictionaries so a fuzzer can produce the keywords, magic bytes, and tokens a target expects. Covers extracting tokens from source, headers, binaries, and specifications, dictionary syntax, and wiring one into libFuzzer or AFL++. Use when fuzzing a parser, protocol, or file format, when coverage stalls at input validation, or when a target compares against fixed strings.PlanningNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- coverage-analysistrailofbits/skillsMeasures and interprets what a fuzzing campaign actually reaches, using llvm-cov, lcov, or a fuzzer's own coverage output. Covers baselining a new campaign, reading coverage reports, and turning uncovered regions into harness, seed, or dictionary work. Use when a fuzzer plateaus, when judging whether a harness is effective, after changing a harness, or when asking why some code is never reached.MarketingNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- address-sanitizertrailofbits/skillsBuilds and runs code under AddressSanitizer to catch buffer overflows, use-after-free, and other memory errors during fuzzing or tests. Covers -fsanitize=address builds, ASAN_OPTIONS, reading the crash report, LeakSanitizer, and the overhead and platform trade-offs. Use when fuzzing C/C++ or Rust that has unsafe blocks or FFI, when debugging a memory corruption crash, or when reading an ASan stack trace.TestingNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- semgrep-rule-creatortrailofbits/skillsCreates custom Semgrep rules for detecting security vulnerabilities, bug patterns, and code patterns. Use when writing Semgrep rules or building custom static analysis detections.SecurityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- algorand-vulnerability-scannertrailofbits/skillsScans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal).SecurityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- entry-point-analyzertrailofbits/skillsAnalyzes smart contract codebases to identify state-changing entry points for security auditing. Detects externally callable functions that modify state, categorizes them by access level (public, admin, role-restricted, contract-only), and generates structured audit reports. Excludes view/pure/read-only functions. Use when auditing smart contracts (Solidity, Vyper, Solana/Rust, Move, TON, CosmWasm) or when asked to find entry points, audit flows, external functions, access control patterns, or privileged operations.SecurityNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- harness-writingtrailofbits/skillsDesigns and improves fuzzing harnesses for C/C++ and Rust. Covers mapping raw bytes onto a target API, generating structured inputs, avoiding non-determinism and false crashes, and deciding what to fuzz together. Use when writing a first LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput or fuzz_target! harness, when a campaign finds nothing or reports crashes that will not reproduce, or when the target API needs structured rather than raw input.WritingNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- adjudicate-regressiontrailofbits/skillsUse when deciding whether source and live reproduction evidence establish a new regression or an exclusion.OtherNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
tao-finetune-kumo-forecast
NVIDIA/skills
From the author
Kumo-Forecast — transformer-based multivariate time series forecasting with DARR (context-enhanced kNN retrieval), interpretability, and fine-tuning. Use when the user asks to "forecast with Kumo-Forecast", "run forecasting inference", "use perform_forecasting", "DARR mode", "context-enhanced forecasting", "lag horizon attribution", "interpretability", "fine-tune forecasting", "fine-tune forecasting with automl", "hyper-parameter optimization with forecasting", or mentions "kumo-forecast", "moment_head_512_6hr", or "run8_best_model_cr".
Install
npx skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill tao-finetune-kumo-forecast -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/tao-finetune-kumo-forecast/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
What it can touch
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 90
Files (12)
- BENCHMARK.md
- SKILL.md
- config/skillspector-baseline.yaml
- evals/evals.json
- references/automl.md
- references/skill_info.yaml
- references/spec_template_inference_hpo.yaml
- references/spec_template_train.yaml
- schemas/inference_hpo.schema.json
- schemas/train.schema.json
- skill-card.md
- skill.oms.sig