Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
14,555 skills from 421 repositories · updated 3 hours ago
895 skills
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- icse-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ICSE research-track paper, covering subject and benchmark selection, baseline fairness, statistical tests and effect sizes as SE reviewers expect them, qualitative-methods rigor, ablations for AI-based techniques, and threats-driven study design.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- usability-testingrampstackco/claude-skillsPlan and run usability tests on existing or prototype designs including test design, task scripts, moderation, observation, and findings synthesis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to test usability, run a moderated test, run an unmoderated test, validate a design, find usability issues, or improve task completion. Triggers on usability test, usability testing, moderated test, unmoderated test, task script, think aloud, prototype testing, user testing, design validation, task completion. Also triggers when the user has built something and wants to know if real users can use it before shipping.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- replay-user-flowsreticlehq/reticleTurn a user journey you just clicked through into a saved regression check that re-runs deterministically, with no model in the loop and no test code to write. Use when you have driven the same flow twice, when the user wants regression coverage without a Playwright suite, when a refactor needs proving against every existing journey, or when re-verifying by hand is costing a full drive every time.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- drive-desktop-appreticlehq/reticleDrive and verify an Electron or Tauri desktop app from the inside, including the main-process and Rust IPC calls a browser tool cannot see. Use when a desktop app needs testing, when a feature works in the browser but not in the packaged app, when an IPC or invoke call needs proving, when a desktop screenshot or visual diff is wanted, or when you need a headless run of a desktop UI in CI.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- voice-cardNewgooseworks-ai/goose-skillsBuilds or updates a voice card: how one account or person actually writes, measured from about 8 or more of their real posts (length, casing, emoji, openings, pet phrases, opinions with their source). When there are too few posts, it runs a short interview instead. It ends with a test that checks a draft against the card. The brand's rules always beat the card. Use alone when you already have the account's posts or the person on hand; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. run-organic-social, write-outreach, email-lifecycle).TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- messaging-ab-testergooseworks-ai/goose-skillsGenerate 3-5 messaging variants for a value proposition, design structured A/B tests, and analyze results to determine which framing resonates most with ICP. Tests can run via LinkedIn organic posts, cold email subject line splits, or both. Pure reasoning for variant generation and analysis — the user deploys the tests through their own tools. Use when a team can't decide between messaging angles and needs data, not opinions.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- outlier-post-findergooseworks-ai/goose-skillsFind posts that materially outperform an account's normal baseline and explain the hook, topic, format, timing, and audience response patterns worth testing.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- goose-graphics-create-stylegooseworks-ai/goose-skillsEnd-to-end skill that turns a single reference image into a published Gooseworks style — analyzes the image, drafts the slim style spec, renders a hero example plus 2-3 additional formats via Playwright, writes the `gooseworks-style.json` manifest, and publishes via `npx gooseworks styles publish` so other agents can discover it. Mirrors goose-graphics-create-format but for styles.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- mcp-stdio-markeralibaba/skill-upMCP stdio marker smoke skill used by skill-up e2e tests.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- mcp-mocked-markeralibaba/skill-upMCP mocked marker smoke skill used by skill-up e2e tests.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- flaky-skillalibaba/skill-upA skill with potentially flaky behavior for testing retryTestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- experimentation-platform-orchestratorrampstackco/claude-skillsA platform decision framework for experimentation. When to use Statsig vs PostHog vs GrowthBook vs Optimizely vs Amplitude vs Eppo vs Kameleoon. How to migrate between them. How to coordinate when multi-platform is genuinely warranted. The decisions that compound for years and the ones you can defer. Triggers on which experimentation platform, choose Statsig vs PostHog, evaluate experimentation tools, switch experimentation platform, migrate from Optimizely, consolidate experimentation tools, multi-platform experimentation, experimentation platform decision, ab test platform selection, feature flag platform vs experiment platform, warehouse-native experiments, vendor lock-in experimentation. Also triggers when a team is asking about cost, governance, or migration cost across experimentation tools, or when an evaluation is starting.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- data-warehouse-experimentationrampstackco/claude-skillsRunning experiments out of the data warehouse instead of via dedicated experiment platforms. SQL-based assignment, exposure logging discipline, metric definitions in dbt models, statistical analysis in SQL or Python, variance reduction with CUPED, sequential testing, and the operational tradeoffs vs platforms like Statsig and Optimizely. Triggers on warehouse-native experimentation, run experiments in BigQuery, run experiments in Snowflake, dbt experiments, SQL t-test, CUPED variance reduction, exposure log, sample ratio mismatch, sequential testing, mSPRT, doubly robust estimation, build vs buy experimentation. Also triggers when the team is choosing between platform and warehouse, building warehouse-native experiment infrastructure, auditing one, or running an experiment with a custom metric the platform cannot handle.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- integration-orchestratorrampstackco/claude-skillsGenerate a phased delivery orchestration plan for creative-direction-driven work: which skills run when, what locks at which gate, how handoffs occur, and how the cadence implements in the team's tools (Jira, Linear, Notion, Figma, GitHub) with AI agents via MCP and CLI. A temporal map of phases, lock points, handoff specs, gate definitions, and QA verification gates. Distinct from `creative-brief` (static project brief) and `creative-direction` (aesthetic direction). Triggers on integration orchestrator, delivery cadence, project orchestration, when does the brief lock, how to phase creative direction, design-development handoff, QA gate, agent-driven QA, and when a creative-direction project is starting, mid-flight with broken cadence, or integrating AI agents into PM workflow. Does NOT fire for project scoping (use `creative-brief`), aesthetic direction (use `creative-direction`), or general project management without a creative-direction throughline.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- beta-program-managementrampstackco/claude-skillsRunning closed and open betas that produce real signal. Beta participant selection, structured feedback collection, beta-to-GA decision criteria, and the difference between soft-launch (no structure, no signal), kitchen-sink (everyone in, no actionable feedback), and structured beta (calibrated cohort, intentional feedback loops, clear graduation criteria). Triggers on beta program, alpha test, beta cohort, beta participant, beta feedback, beta to GA decision, design partner, early access program, closed beta, open beta, RC release. Also triggers when a feature is approaching launch and the team needs structured pre-GA validation, when prior betas produced noise rather than signal, or when the team has soft-launched before but wants more structured feedback this time.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- founder-boardJakeschincariol/founder-skillYour board of directors. Puts a business idea in front of a three-member board, each a sub-agent reading the idea through one published framework: the Offers lens (from Alex Hormozi's $100M Offers), the Monopoly lens (from Peter Thiel's Zero to One) and the Product lens (from Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs). Each member scores the idea, names the risks that would kill it and votes fund, fund with conditions, or pass. Use when the user says "test my business idea", "would this work", "pressure-test this", "what would a board say", "is this a good business", or starts the founder pack on a new idea.TestingNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —
- content-refresh-systemrampstackco/claude-skillsSystematic content refresh discipline. Quarterly audits, refresh prioritization (which pieces, when, how deep), refresh-vs-merge-vs-delete decisions, the lifecycle that distinguishes intentional refresh from set-and-forget decay. Builds on the refresh sections of pillar-content-architecture and editorial-qa with a program-level discipline. Triggers on content refresh, content decay, content audit, refresh prioritization, content lifecycle, refresh strategy, traffic decay, ranking drop, content freshness, evergreen content, content maintenance. Also triggers when traffic is eroding silently across an aging content library, when teams cannot decide which pieces to refresh, or when refresh work is happening but the impact is unclear.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- founder-offerJakeschincariol/founder-skillBuilds an offer too good to refuse. Lists every problem the buyer hits on the way to the result they want, turns each into a solution, trims to what is cheap to deliver and valuable to the buyer, and stacks it with honest bonuses, a guarantee the CFO can afford, real urgency and a clear name. Scores it on the value equation (outcome, likelihood, time, effort) and re-tests it on a quick buyer panel. Use when the user says "make my offer better", "why won't people buy", "what should I include", "guarantee", "bonuses", "grand slam offer", or after the panel shows people passing.TestingNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —
- founder-launchJakeschincariol/founder-skillYour launch lead. Builds a dated, step-by-step launch plan: a cheap real-world test first (a waitlist, a pre-sale or a pop-up with a real price, so real buyers confirm what the simulated panel said), then the countdown to opening day with owners and deadlines, the launch-day run sheet, and the first 30 days of what to measure and what to change. Use when the user says "how do I launch", "launch plan", "when can I open", "launch checklist", "go live", or "soft open".TestingNo warnings★ 1.5K↓ —
- evidence-based-reviewsrampstackco/claude-skillsProduce honest product reviews and buying guides without fabricated first-hand experience, using disclosed evidence tiers: verified specs, owner-experience synthesis at scale, expert triangulation, and hands-on only when true. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write product reviews or buying guides without hands-on access, set up a review methodology, add evidence disclosure to review content, align reviews with Google's reviews system or FTC affiliate disclosure expectations, or decide when Review and Product schema are honest to use. Triggers on product review, buying guide, best-of list, review methodology, evidence basis, hands-on testing, we tested, affiliate review site, review disclosure, methodology block, original research, reviews system. Also triggers when review content claims testing that did not happen, or when an affiliate site needs a trust mechanism that survives scrutiny.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- ticket-authoringNewrampstackco/claude-skillsWrite complete, ready-to-pull work items for an issue tracker: bugs, tasks, stories, spikes, and epics, each with the fields, attachments, and done test its type requires. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write a ticket, create a Jira issue, Linear issue, or GitHub issue, file a bug report, write a user story or acceptance criteria, scope a spike, open an epic, or break work into tasks. Triggers on write a ticket, create an issue, file a bug, bug report, user story, spike, epic, task breakdown, turn this into tickets, break this down, acceptance criteria, definition of ready, ready for dev, backlog item, capitalization stage. Also triggers when the user pastes a PRD, a spec, or a bug description and asks what to do with it, even if they never say the word ticket.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- brand-voicerampstackco/claude-skillsDevelop or document a complete brand voice and tone system covering voice attributes, tone shifts by context, vocabulary preferences, grammar rules, and copy examples. Use this skill whenever the user wants to define how a brand sounds, write a voice and tone document, audit existing copy for voice consistency, train a team or AI assistant on brand voice, or refine the personality of brand writing. Triggers on brand voice, voice and tone, tone of voice, writing voice, brand personality, copy voice, voice document, voice guidelines, how should we write, voice training, voice audit. Also triggers when the user has copy that 'feels off' and the underlying issue is voice, even if not stated explicitly. On a voice consistency check, this skill owns defining and documenting the voice system; use `editorial-qa` when a specific draft needs checking against an existing system before it publishes.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- qa-testingrampstackco/claude-skillsRun QA testing on a page, feature, or full site at one of three depth tiers (smoke, standard, full). Use this skill whenever the user asks to QA a page or site, run a smoke test after a deploy, verify a page before launch, or run a regression sweep. Triggers on QA, QA sweep, smoke test, regression test, post-deploy check, pre-launch check, verify the deploy, test this page, does the page render, broken link, 404, image not loading. Also triggers proactively after a deploy or a new page launch where verification matters. Covers accessibility, performance, and SEO at the surface-signal level only: deep audits belong to `accessibility-audit`, `performance-optimization`, and `seo-technical`, and code-level debugging to `code-review-web`.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —