Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
14,555 skills from 421 repositories · updated 1 hour ago
895 skills
- webhook-managementhoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorConfigure and validate CCAM webhook targets across supported chat, incident, automation, and generic providers. Use when listing provider requirements, creating or updating a target, scoping it to alert rules, sending a test notification, reviewing delivery history, or deleting a target.TestingNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- evals-bootstrapundefined-ui/second-brain-osScaffold a first eval suite for an agent: mine real failures into cases, write behavioural checks over traces, and generate the runner. Use when the user wants evals, regression tests for an agent, a golden set, or asks how to know a prompt/model change did not break things. Do NOT use for a single task's done-check (goal-test) or for auditing context (context-audit).TestingNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- goal-testundefined-ui/second-brain-osTurn a vague task into a testable definition of done and generate an executable goal-test script for it, optionally with a bounded retry loop around a headless agent. Use when the user wants to run an agent in a loop, asks how to know when an agent task is finished, or says a goal like "improve X" needs to become checkable. Do NOT use for building eval suites over many cases — that is evals-bootstrap.TestingNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- miniprogram-developmentTencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-ToolkitWeChat Mini Program development skill for building, debugging, previewing, testing, publishing, and optimizing mini program projects (小程序开发、调试、预览、发布). Covers project structure and config (`project.config.json`, `appid`, `miniprogramRoot`, `tabBar`, routing/navigation, icon assets), WeChat Developer Tools Nightly workflows (`wechatide` CLI, WeChat IDE Skills/MCP), `miniprogram-ci` preview/upload, console/network debugging, message push (消息推送) and customer-service auto-reply (客服消息), mini program SEO / search indexing (小程序搜索优化、页面收录、搜索推广、mpcrawler), and CloudBase integration (`wx.cloud`, 腾讯云开发, 云开发) when explicitly used. Use when users create, develop, modify, debug, preview, deploy, publish, or promote WeChat Mini Programs. NOT for Web frontend (use web-development), pure backend services (use cloudrun-development / cloud-functions), or UI-design-only tasks (use ui-design).TestingNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —Also in 3 other repos
- false-green-testsreticlehq/reticleFind out why the tests pass but the app is broken. Catches false greens: a green suite over a feature that does not work, a mocked API standing in for a real one, an assertion that holds no matter what the app does, a click handler wired to nothing. Use when the suite is green and the user says it is broken, when a test never fails, when coverage looks fine but bugs still ship, or before trusting a passing run you did not watch.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- team-builder-packagingagentlas-ai/Agentlas-OSUse when generating or auditing a multi-role agent team package with orchestrator, PM Soul, Memory Curator, Policy Gate, workers, eval, QA, handoffs, and runtime adapters.TestingNo warnings★ 1.6K↓ —Also in 4 other repos
- second-brain-quizundefined-ui/second-brain-osGenerate questions from the user's own concept pages so they can find out what they saved but never learned, and compare their answers against what the pages say. Use this skill when the user wants to test themselves, revise, make flashcards from their notes, or asks what they have forgotten. Do NOT use for generic quizzing on a topic the vault does not cover, or for answering a question from the vault.TestingNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- scenario-refine-loopscenario-labs/skillsUse when a Scenario output must be checked and improved rather than accepted first roll: iterating a generation until it matches the brief, fixing a batch that came back off-brief, retrying failed shots methodically, wiring an automated generate, review, revise loop, or deciding whether to re-prompt, swap references, inpaint, post-process, or change model. Keywords: refine, iterate, critique, review loop, QA, self-correction, verify, acceptance criteria, retry, drift.TestingNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- drive-desktop-appreticlehq/reticleDrive and verify an Electron or Tauri desktop app from the inside, including the main-process and Rust IPC calls a browser tool cannot see. Use when a desktop app needs testing, when a feature works in the browser but not in the packaged app, when an IPC or invoke call needs proving, when a desktop screenshot or visual diff is wanted, or when you need a headless run of a desktop UI in CI.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- agentic-tddreticlehq/reticleTest-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- brand-voicerampstackco/claude-skillsDevelop or document a complete brand voice and tone system covering voice attributes, tone shifts by context, vocabulary preferences, grammar rules, and copy examples. Use this skill whenever the user wants to define how a brand sounds, write a voice and tone document, audit existing copy for voice consistency, train a team or AI assistant on brand voice, or refine the personality of brand writing. Triggers on brand voice, voice and tone, tone of voice, writing voice, brand personality, copy voice, voice document, voice guidelines, how should we write, voice training, voice audit. Also triggers when the user has copy that 'feels off' and the underlying issue is voice, even if not stated explicitly. On a voice consistency check, this skill owns defining and documenting the voice system; use `editorial-qa` when a specific draft needs checking against an existing system before it publishes.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- audit-my-appreticlehq/reticleSweep a whole running web app for what is broken, without writing a script or knowing the codebase. Clicks every reachable control and reports dead buttons, console errors, failed requests, and places where the API and the screen disagree. Use on an unfamiliar codebase, before a release, after a big merge or dependency bump, when the user asks for a smoke test or a health check, or when someone says "just check everything still works".TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- ticket-authoringNewrampstackco/claude-skillsWrite complete, ready-to-pull work items for an issue tracker: bugs, tasks, stories, spikes, and epics, each with the fields, attachments, and done test its type requires. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write a ticket, create a Jira issue, Linear issue, or GitHub issue, file a bug report, write a user story or acceptance criteria, scope a spike, open an epic, or break work into tasks. Triggers on write a ticket, create an issue, file a bug, bug report, user story, spike, epic, task breakdown, turn this into tickets, break this down, acceptance criteria, definition of ready, ready for dev, backlog item, capitalization stage. Also triggers when the user pastes a PRD, a spec, or a bug description and asks what to do with it, even if they never say the word ticket.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- podc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when building the evidence for an ACM PODC paper — where "evidence" is a proof, not a benchmark. Covers matching upper and lower bounds, tightness arguments, model and assumption stress-tests, adversary-strength calibration, and the honest, clearly-optional role of any simulation in a distributed-computing-theory paper.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- icse-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ICSE research-track paper, covering subject and benchmark selection, baseline fairness, statistical tests and effect sizes as SE reviewers expect them, qualitative-methods rigor, ablations for AI-based techniques, and threats-driven study design.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- icml-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when stress-testing ICML experimental evidence before submission or rebuttal, including strong tuned baselines, mechanism-isolating ablations, seed variance and confidence intervals, compute disclosure, data leakage and split construction, reproducibility, negative results, and fit to ICML soundness, originality, and significance scoring.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.TestingNo warnings★ 1.3K↓ —
- evidence-based-reviewsrampstackco/claude-skillsProduce honest product reviews and buying guides without fabricated first-hand experience, using disclosed evidence tiers: verified specs, owner-experience synthesis at scale, expert triangulation, and hands-on only when true. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write product reviews or buying guides without hands-on access, set up a review methodology, add evidence disclosure to review content, align reviews with Google's reviews system or FTC affiliate disclosure expectations, or decide when Review and Product schema are honest to use. Triggers on product review, buying guide, best-of list, review methodology, evidence basis, hands-on testing, we tested, affiliate review site, review disclosure, methodology block, original research, reviews system. Also triggers when review content claims testing that did not happen, or when an affiliate site needs a trust mechanism that survives scrutiny.TestingNo warnings★ 989↓ —
- building-livekit-agentsfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsBuilds voice and chat AI agents with LiveKit Agents on LiveKit Cloud or a self-hosted server. Use when the user asks to "build a voice agent", "create a LiveKit agent", "add voice AI to my app", "implement handoffs", "structure an agent workflow", "my agent is slow / too chatty", "it says it booked but nothing was saved", "make it confirm before committing", "it keeps re-asking things the caller already said", or is writing code against the LiveKit Agents SDK. Covers architecture: designing for latency, keeping context small, splitting a monolithic agent into handoffs and tasks, and designing for voice. Also covers keeping the model in charge of meaning while code owns state, approvals, and effects. For API specifics use reading-livekit-docs. To check behavior use debugging-livekit-agents and testing-livekit-agents.TestingNo warnings★ 1.2K↓ —
- running-livekit-simulationsfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsRuns LiveKit agent simulations and acts on the results. Use when the user says "run my simulations", "regression test my agent before deploying", "run the scenarios", "use lk agent simulate", "did my agent pass", "why did this scenario fail", "run simulations in CI", "test the audio pipeline", "check turn-taking and interruptions", or wants to check whole-conversation behavior before shipping. Covers text and audio mode and what each catches, running against a local or deployed agent, degraded-audio flags, automating a pre-release run, and triaging failures with list, view and export. For writing the scenarios use writing-livekit-scenarios. Not the default for a bare "test my agent", which goes to debugging-livekit-agents. Use this skill when the user names simulations, scenarios, a run, CI, or shipping.TestingNo warnings★ 1.2K↓ —
- frontend-testing-debuggingfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsUse when testing, debugging, or making targeted improvements to rendered frontend apps through the Frontend Design Skills or web dev plugin: local dev servers, UI regressions, interaction bugs, console errors, responsive layout, and visual QA. Check whether the Browser plugin is available and use it first when it is; otherwise use regular Playwright with the recorded reason.TestingNo warnings★ 1.2K↓ —
- scenario-quality-gatescenario-labs/skillsUse when a generated Scenario image needs a quality check or a brand-brief compliance verdict before it ships: pass/warn/fail scoring, on-brand review against a configured brief, QA gating a batch, pricing or refreshing a stored verdict, or iterating a generation until it clears the gate. Keywords: quality gate, quality check, QA, verdict, brief compliance, on-brand, brand brief, pass fail, score, review, asset_quality_gate_run.TestingNo warnings★ 1.1K↓ —
- testing-livekit-agentsfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsWrites turn-level tests for a LiveKit agent in the user's normal test suite: pytest (Python) or Vitest (Node.js). Use when the user asks to "write tests for my agent", "add a test for this tool", "test the handoff", "pin this bug", "why does my agent test fail", or after building or changing agent behavior that needs regression coverage. Covers the SDK's test session harness, assertions on messages, tool calls and handoffs, LLM judging of a reply against an intent, mocking tools, multi-turn tests, and judging whole conversations with the built-in judges. For interactive poking use debugging-livekit-agents. For grading whole conversations at scale use running-livekit-simulations.TestingNo warnings★ 1.2K↓ —
- dogfoodfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsSystematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.TestingNo warnings★ 1.2K↓ —