Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
9,277 skills from 267 repositories · updated 31 minutes ago
713 skills
- novelty-checkbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVerify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- paper-writingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsWorkflow 3: Full paper writing pipeline. Orchestrates paper-plan → paper-figure → paper-write → paper-compile → auto-paper-improvement-loop to go from a narrative report to a polished, submission-ready PDF. Use when user says "写论文全流程", "write paper pipeline", "从报告到PDF", "paper writing", or wants the complete paper generation workflow.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- stata-toolkitbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsActivate when users mention Stata commands, .do files, regressions, econometrics, stored results, graphs, dataset inspection, replication, or Stata errors. Route the task through mcp-stata tools and the specialized research skills instead of treating it as plain text coding.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- paper-stylebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsRestructure an academic paper's title and section structure to match a target journal's house style. Asks the user to specify the target journal first, then adjusts main.tex accordingly (title wording and case, section skeleton, heading case, numbering scheme, merging/splitting sections). Trigger when user says "paper style" / "paper-style" / "期刊风格" / "按目标期刊调整" / "调整为XX风格" / "JFE风格" / "convert to journal style" / "restructure for [journal]", or wants a paper's title/sections reformatted for a specific journal submission.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- readabilitybrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsCorrect grammar errors, typos, and improve academic readability in LaTeX, Markdown, or plain-text manuscripts. Scans the document once, then walks through every issue one-by-one asking for approval before applying each fix. Trigger when the user says "readability", "check grammar", "fix typos", "proofread for grammar", "improve readability", "polish wording", "语言润色", "修语法", or asks you to clean up the prose in a paper/chapter/section without wanting full content restructuring.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- orchestratorbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUnified Agent Teams orchestrator for Diverga v12.0.0. Manages Agent Teams creation, VS Arena debate, and subagent dispatch. Single entry point for all parallel/debate workflows. Replaces research-orchestrator and vs-arena skills. Triggers: orchestrator, agent team, create team, parallel agents, debate, competing, collaborate, VS ArenaScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- grant-proposalbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsDraft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- idea-discoverybrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsWorkflow 1: Full idea discovery pipeline. Orchestrates research-lit → idea-creator → novelty-check → research-review to go from a broad research direction to validated, pilot-tested ideas. Use when user says "找idea全流程", "idea discovery pipeline", "从零开始找方向", or wants the complete idea exploration workflow.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- paper-polishbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsProofread and verify academic papers in LaTeX. Runs 19 sequential checks covering titles, consistency, citations, formatting, theoretical tension in motivation, concise results reporting, cross-section repetition, em-dash usage, and auxiliary-text-to-footnote conversion. Trigger when user says "check paper" / "proofread" / "paper-checker" / "校对" / "核查论文".ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- web-researchbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsSearches multiple web sources, synthesizes findings, and produces cited research reports using delegated subagents. Use when the user asks to research a topic online, search the web, look something up, find current information, compare options, or produce a research report.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- research-refinebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsTurn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- research-reviewbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsGet a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- result-to-claimbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- novelty-checkbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVerify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- semantic-scholarbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsSearch published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.) via Semantic Scholar API. Complements /arxiv (preprints) with citation counts, venue metadata, and TLDR. Use when user says "search semantic scholar", "find IEEE papers", "find journal papers", "venue papers", "citation search", or wants published literature beyond arXiv preprints.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- paper-pipelinebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsOrchestrate the complete post-first-draft polishing pipeline for an academic LaTeX paper by invoking five existing skills in fixed order: (1) paper-polish, (2) paper-self-revise, (3) paper-style, (4) paper-polish again, (5) reference-verify. Trigger when user says "paper pipeline" / "paper-pipeline" / "论文流水线" / "全流程打磨" / "一条龙打磨" / "初稿打磨" / "full polish pipeline" / "run the whole pipeline", or wants the entire post-draft polishing sequence run on a paper folder. Use this skill whenever the user asks for several paper-finishing steps (polish + revise + style + reference check) on one manuscript in one go, even if they don't name every individual skill.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- referee-reportbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsGenerate academic referee reports for economics/finance papers, followed by a 150-word letter to the editor with recommendation (Reject / Major Revision) and Kai Wu signature. Two modes (normal / high-level), configurable number of comments; recommendation choice drives evaluation tone (Reject → negative, Major Revision → neutral). Trigger when user says "referee report" / "write referee report" / "审稿报告" / "写审稿意见" / "generate referee report" / "review this paper".ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- lfgbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsFull autonomous research workflow — brainstorm, plan, implement, review, and documentScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- research-pipelinebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsFull research pipeline: Workflow 1 (idea discovery) → implementation → Workflow 2 (auto review loop). Goes from a broad research direction all the way to a submission-ready paper. Use when user says "全流程", "full pipeline", "从找idea到投稿", "end-to-end research", or wants the complete autonomous research lifecycle.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- paper-reviewbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when a paper is complete or near-complete and a holistic pre-submission audit is needed. Cross-cuts text, code, tables, figures, results, citations, and reproducibility in a single pass and produces a persistent audit report. Works standalone on papers written outside the plugin.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- slfgbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsFull autonomous research workflow using swarm mode for parallel executionScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- apsa-stylebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsAPSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- formula-derivationbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsStructures and derives research formulas when the user wants to 推导公式, build a theory line, organize assumptions, turn scattered equations into a coherent derivation, or rewrite theory notes into a paper-ready formula document. Use when the derivation target is not yet fully fixed, the main object still needs to be chosen, or the user needs a coherent derivation package rather than a finished theorem proof.ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
- paper-writingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when drafting, rewriting, reviewing, or auditing prose for any section of an empirical academic paper (Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Data, Results, Discussion, Conclusion) or specialized output (job market paper, grant proposal, policy brief, referee response).ScienceNo warnings★ 4.7K↓ —
paper-pipeline
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
ScienceUpdated 2 days ago
From the author
Orchestrate the complete post-first-draft polishing pipeline for an academic LaTeX paper by invoking five existing skills in fixed order: (1) paper-polish, (2) paper-self-revise, (3) paper-style, (4) paper-polish again, (5) reference-verify. Trigger when user says "paper pipeline" / "paper-pipeline" / "论文流水线" / "全流程打磨" / "一条龙打磨" / "初稿打磨" / "full polish pipeline" / "run the whole pipeline", or wants the entire post-draft polishing sequence run on a paper folder. Use this skill whenever the user asks for several paper-finishing steps (polish + revise + style + reference check) on one manuscript in one go, even if they don't name every individual skill.
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill paper-pipeline -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/paper-pipeline/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (Custom or unclear) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
What it can touch
Instructions onlyNo network use seenLicence: Custom or unclear
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 85
Security100
Provenance84
Maintenance100
Licence45
Adoption58
Files (1)
- SKILL.md