Agent skills you can check before you install
Public SKILL.md skills from GitHub repositories with 50+ stars and from the vendors themselves, scanned and scored. Install any of them with one command in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot or Gemini CLI.
45,604 skills from 2,205 repositories · updated 13 hours ago
5,657 skills
- python-formatGoldziher/ai-rulezFormats Python files with ruff format and reports which files changed.EngineeringNo warnings★ 163↓ —
- refactor-safelytechygarg/latticeRestructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right layer', 'simplify this code', or 'improve this structure'.EngineeringNo warnings★ 209↓ —
- stable-baselines3foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsProduction-ready reinforcement learning algorithms (PPO, SAC, DQN, TD3, DDPG, A2C) with scikit-learn-like API. Use for standard RL experiments, quick prototyping, and well-documented algorithm implementations. Best for single-agent RL with Gymnasium environments. For high-performance parallel training, multi-agent systems, or custom vectorized environments, use pufferlib instead.EngineeringNo warnings★ 3.8K↓ —
- pytorch-lightningforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsDeep learning framework (PyTorch Lightning). Organize PyTorch code into LightningModules, configure Trainers for multi-GPU/TPU, implement data pipelines, callbacks, logging (W&B, TensorBoard), distributed training (DDP, FSDP, DeepSpeed), for scalable neural network training.EngineeringNo warnings★ 3.8K↓ —
- literature-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsConduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).EngineeringNo warnings★ 3.8K↓ —
- nw-par-review-criterianWave-ai/nWaveQuality dimensions and review checklist for devop reviewsEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-legacy-refactoring-dddnWave-ai/nWaveDDD-guided legacy refactoring patterns -- strangler fig, bubble context, ACL migration, 14 tactical/strategic/infrastructure patterns, and incremental monolith-to-microservices methodologyEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-po-review-dimensionsnWave-ai/nWaveRequirements quality critique dimensions for peer review - confirmation bias detection, completeness validation, clarity checks, testability assessment, and priority validationEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- clerk-nuxt-patternsclerk/skillsNuxt 3 auth patterns with @clerk/nuxt - middleware, composables, server API routes, SSR. Triggers on: Nuxt auth, useAuth composable, clerkMiddleware Nuxt, server API Clerk, Nuxt route protection.OfficialEngineeringNo warnings★ 89↓ —
- nw-der-review-criterianWave-ai/nWaveEvaluation criteria and scoring for data engineering artifact reviewsEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-tr-review-criterianWave-ai/nWaveReview dimensions and scoring for root cause analysis quality assessmentEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-dr-review-criterianWave-ai/nWaveCritique dimensions, severity framework, verdict decision matrix, and review output format for documentation assessment reviewsEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-review-workflownWave-ai/nWaveDetailed review process, v2 validation checklist, and scoring methodology for agent definition reviewsEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-refactornWave-ai/nWaveApplies the Refactoring Priority Premise (RPP) levels L1-L6 for systematic code refactoring. Use when improving code quality through structured refactoring passes.EngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- 65-team-performance-review-globalminhnv0807/ai-business-skillsUse when a leader evaluates a marketing TEAM MEMBER using data — a KPI scorecard by role, strengths with real examples, areas to improve stated as observable behavior, a 30 and 90 day development plan, and a 1-5 rating rubric. Trigger on 'performance review for my marketer', 'evaluate a team member', 'monthly 1:1 review', 'feedback for my content writer', 'development plan for an employee', 'is this person underperforming'. Also use when the user is unhappy with someone and cannot articulate why. Not for — evaluating a campaign rather than a person, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`; reviewing one piece of output, see `62-marketing-review-global`; scoring an external vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.EngineeringNo warnings★ 628↓ —
- code-reviewerforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsDefault code-quality route for broad code review, PR review, maintainability, correctness, and regression-risk checks. Do not use as the primary route for dedicated OWASP/security audits, review-feedback handling, completion verification, AI-code cleanup, or TDD/test-first work.EngineeringNo warnings★ 3.8K↓ —
- 65-team-performance-reviewminhnv0807/ai-business-skillsDung khi can danh gia CON NGUOI trong team marketing dua tren du lieu — KPI scorecard theo tung vai tro writer, designer, media buyer; diem manh co vi du that; diem can cai thien; development plan 30-90 ngay; rubric cham 1-5. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'danh gia nhan vien', 'performance review', 'review nhan su', '1:1 review thang', 'nguoi nay lam duoc khong', 'co nen tang luong khong', 'feedback cho team member'. Khong dung cho — tong ket mot campaign thay vi con nguoi thi dung skill 63-campaign-retrospective; duyet chat luong mot output cu the thi dung skill 62-marketing-review; giao viec va dat deadline thi dung skill 64-team-brief.EngineeringNo warnings★ 628↓ —
- ci-failuresGoldziher/ai-rulezSummarizes failing CI jobs for a pull request. Use when asked why a PR build is red.EngineeringNo warnings★ 163↓ —
- supply-chain-risk-auditortrailofbits/skillsAudits a project's dependencies for supply-chain risk: version-matched advisories for direct dependencies and the full lockfile tree, abandoned or archived upstreams, npm publisher concentration, and install-time script execution. Use when asked to audit dependencies, assess supply-chain or third-party package risk, or review a dependency tree before an engagement.EngineeringNo warnings★ 7.8K↓ —
- nw-diverger-review-criterianWave-ai/nWaveReview criteria for the nw-diverger-reviewer — validates JTBD rigor, research quality, option diversity, taste application correctness, and recommendation coherence in DIVERGE wave artifactsEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-progressive-refactoringnWave-ai/nWaveProgressive L1-L6 refactoring hierarchy, 22 code smell taxonomy, atomic transformations, test code smells, and Fowler refactoring catalogEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-sd-patterns-advancednWave-ai/nWaveAdvanced distributed patterns - event sourcing, CQRS, saga, stream processing, append-only log, exactly-once delivery, sequencer, double-entry ledger, erasure coding, order book, watermarksEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-sc-review-dimensionsnWave-ai/nWaveReviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validationEngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo
- nw-review-output-formatnWave-ai/nWaveYAML output format and approval criteria for platform design reviews. Load when generating review feedback.EngineeringNo warnings★ 622↓ —Also in 1 other repo