nw-agent-evals
From the author
Lightweight eval method for testing nWave AGENTS and SKILLS (LLM behavior) as a lean alternative to heavy BDD/ATD. An eval = one prompt -> one captured run (trace + artifacts) -> a small set of checks -> a comparable score over time. Load when validating agent behavior, building a regression net for an agent/skill, or reducing agent-test bloat.
Install
npx skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-agent-evals -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/nw-agent-evals/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 87
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- agent-evalsnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherBuild an eval suite that can actually detect a regression — cases pulled from real traffic, graders that check properties rather than vibes, a recorded baseline, and per-case diffs in both directions. Use before claiming a prompt, model or agent change is an improvement, when agent behaviour must not regress, or when someone reports "it seems better" after eyeballing a handful of outputs. Not for tracing what one run did (llm-observability), not for testing deterministic code, and never as evidence that behaviour the suite does not measure is safe.Testing★ 58
- agent-evalericrisco/rsc-harnessUse when measuring whether an LLM or agent system actually got better and gating merges on it: golden sets, fixing an inflated LLM-as-judge, scoring RAG (faithfulness, contextual recall) or agent trajectories (tool correctness, completion), or picking an eval framework. NOT building the agent loop, tools or RAG plumbing (that is `building-agents`).Other★ 483
- agent-evaluationthiientv/godmodeDesigns and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.Testing★ 100
- meta-evalagentscope-ai/OpenJudgeUse when the user wants to build an evaluation system for an LLM/agent application but doesn't know where to start — they have traces, prompts, RAG pipelines, or nothing at all. Also use when the user mentions evaluation, eval, benchmarking, testing LLM quality, measuring agent performance, assessing RAG accuracy, or wants to compare prompts/models. This skill is the entry router: it asks diagnostic questions then recommends which sub-skill (local workflow) to use next.Testing★ 1.1K
- llm-evaluationwshobson/agentsImplement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.Testing★ 42.2K
- agentic-evalgithub/awesome-copilotPatterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response qualityTesting★ 40.8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in