code-review
From the author
Multi-agent code review run as a debate. Critics raise findings in parallel, an Author defends the change, Critics concede or maintain, and a Judge rules on what stays contested. Findings are classified by kind and blocking, and handled durably when previously decided. Use `rq` to request a review of diffs (defaults to main branch), `rs` to respond to findings and record intentional non-fix decisions beside the relevant code. Triggers on "review this", "review my code", "code review", "check for bugs", "audit this", when examining PRs, pull requests, branches, or diffs. Always asks user before applying fixes or adding decision comments.
Install
npx skills add martinffx/atelier --skill code-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/code-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- reviewskillmds/skillmdRun all five review agents on changes, synthesize findings, triage based on developer thinking, and fix approved items. Trigger when the user says "review", "run the agents", "run all four", "run all five", "full review", "code review", or similar.Engineering★ 192
- review-codetobihagemann/turboReview code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".Engineering★ 417
- adr-reviewrjmurillo/ai-agentsMulti-agent debate orchestration for Architecture Decision Records. Automatically triggers on ADR create/edit/delete. Coordinates architect, critic, independent-thinker, security, analyst, and high-level-advisor agents in structured debate rounds until consensus. Use when you say "review this ADR", when an ADR is created/edited/deleted, or when reviewing, accepting, or updating a decision file under .project-toolkit/architecture/, docs/architecture/, docs/decisions/, docs/adr/, or architecture/decisions/, including intent like "review this decision record" or "check this rationale for future maintainers". Do NOT use to author a new ADR (use adr-generator).Engineering★ 50
- code-review-and-qualityaddyosmani/agent-skillsConducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.Engineering★ 113.2K
- review-responseNoobyGains/godmodeUse when code review feedback arrives from the user, a reviewer subagent, another model, a human colleague or an automated tool, before changing any code in response, and especially when the feedback is unclear, looks wrong, or contains several items that may depend on each other.Engineering★ 117
- bmad-code-reviewalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideReview code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"Engineering★ 85
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in