agent-roundtable
From the author
Run a multi-agent audit of a feature, PR/diff, or task spec in which Codex, Command Code (cmd), Gemini, OpenCode and Claude debate over ACP for a configurable number of rounds and converge on a final spec, a prioritized task list and improvements. Claude moderates and synthesizes; every other agent gets a final veto. Use when the user says "roundtable", "agent roundtable", "audit this with codex", "have the agents discuss/debate this", "get a second (third) opinion from other agents", "multi-agent review", "council", or wants several coding agents to agree on a spec.
Install
npx skills add glebis/claude-skills --skill agent-roundtable -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/agent-roundtable/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- config-audithoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorRun a full audit of the user's Claude Code configuration via the Agent Monitor Config Explorer API: counts per surface (user vs project), duplicate or overlapping skills and subagents, hooks that run shell commands, and which surfaces are read-only vs mutable. Reads /api/cc-config/overview, /skills, /agents, /commands, /hooks, and /settings. Use when reviewing your Claude Code setup for sprawl, duplication, or risk.Engineering★ 1.1K
- agent-councilmagnus919/agent-skillsRun a structured multi-agent debate by spawning a panel of expert agents on any question, with convergence-aware iteration and typed synthesis output via the `agent-council` CLI. Use when a decision has genuine tradeoffs, high stakes, or hidden assumptions worth adversarial collaboration, or when confidence diagnostics matter more than a single recommendation. Compatible with any AI agent harness that supports agentskills.io skills (Claude Code, Cursor, Hermes Agent, OpenHands, etc.). Do not use for simple factual lookups, tasks with a clear correct answer, routine single-perspective work, or code execution and tool orchestration beyond debate.Engineering★ 165
- agentsmd-optimizemajiayu000/spellbookAudit and organize AI coding-agent instructions, including AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills, and agent definitions. Use when the user asks to diagnose conflicting instructions, excessive approval pauses, broad skill triggers, duplicate guidance, or broken instruction references, or to clean up that instruction set. Ordinary code review, Markdown editing, or application debugging alone does not trigger this workflow. Inspection stays read-only; apply changes when authorized.Writing★ 290
- roundtablett-a1i/matt-skills-with-to-goalConvene a roundtable of sub-agents that debate a decision or proposal from opposing perspectives — parallel independent statements, anonymous cross-review, then a chaired verdict reporting consensus and dissent.Engineering★ 193
- agentic-readinessCodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-developmentAudit and improve repositories for reliable agentic work across Codex and Codex App, Claude Code, and OpenCode. Use when reviewing AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md quality and discovery, instruction routing in monorepos or meta-repos, agent settings, MCP configuration, skills, subagents, context budgets, or repository organization for coding agents.Engineering★ 167
- context-auditundefined-ui/second-brain-osAudit an agent's context layout against the four places: system prompt, tools, history, tail. Use when the user asks to audit, review or fix their agent's context, prompt caching, token spend per turn, or CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md layout. Read-only: reports findings and a fix list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for writing evals (evals-bootstrap) or for loop design (goal-test).Productivity★ 1.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in