review-gate
From the author
Use to review a dispatch before handoff, requirements and plans before implementation, or code after implementation. Runs a fresh reviewer, then a separate context-aware adjudicator; returns evidence-backed dispositions to the main agent. Does not replace tests, acceptance checks or UI QA, and does not authorize execution or publication.
Install
npx skills add KerberosClaw/kc_ai_skills --skill review-gate -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/review-gate/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- review-workcode-yeongyu/oh-my-openagentPost-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.Engineering★ 70.6K
- requesting-code-reviewjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh完成任务、实现重要功能或合并前使用，用于验证工作成果是否符合要求Engineering★ 8.4K
- gate-checkundefined-ui/second-brain-osFind the decisions in a pipeline that do not need the expensive model and propose the gate for each: a rule, a classic classifier, or a small model, with fail-closed routing. Use when the user asks to cut model costs or latency, says the big model handles everything, or wants a triage / routing / filter layer in front of an agent. Analysis plus an optional baseline scaffold. Do NOT use for auditing context layout (context-audit) or for building eval suites (evals-bootstrap).Productivity★ 1.2K
- code-reviewcbrock84/headcountConducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a reasoned response rather than compliance.Engineering★ 2.6K
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGive advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.Engineering★ 1.5K
- review-agentaiskillstore/marketplacePerform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.Engineering★ 451
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in